Literature DB >> 16393025

Egocentrism over e-mail: can we communicate as well as we think?

Justin Kruger1, Nicholas Epley, Jason Parker, Zhi-Wen Ng.   

Abstract

Without the benefit of paralinguistic cues such as gesture, emphasis, and intonation, it can be difficult to convey emotion and tone over electronic mail (e-mail). Five experiments suggest that this limitation is often underappreciated, such that people tend to believe that they can communicate over e-mail more effectively than they actually can. Studies 4 and 5 further suggest that this overconfidence is born of egocentrism, the inherent difficulty of detaching oneself from one's own perspective when evaluating the perspective of someone else. Because e-mail communicators "hear" a statement differently depending on whether they intend to be, say, sarcastic or funny, it can be difficult to appreciate that their electronic audience may not. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16393025     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  13 in total

1.  Auditory hindsight bias.

Authors:  Daniel M Bernstein; Alexander Maurice Wilson; Nicole L M Pernat; Louise R Meilleur
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  Transformation of Adolescent Peer Relations in the Social Media Context: Part 1-A Theoretical Framework and Application to Dyadic Peer Relationships.

Authors:  Jacqueline Nesi; Sophia Choukas-Bradley; Mitchell J Prinstein
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-09

3.  Understanding interprofessional communication: a content analysis of email communications between doctors and nurses.

Authors:  C N C Smith; S D Quan; D Morra; P G Rossos; H Khatibi; V Lo; H Wong; R C Wu
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 4.  The disclosure processes model: understanding disclosure decision making and postdisclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity.

Authors:  Stephenie R Chaudoir; Jeffrey D Fisher
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Daily Stress and Affect Across Adulthood: The Role of Social Interactions via Different Communication Modes.

Authors:  Xin Yao Lin; Margie E Lachman
Journal:  Technol Mind Behav       Date:  2021-02-16

6.  Reading the Mind in the Eyes or reading between the lines? Theory of Mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face.

Authors:  David Engel; Anita Williams Woolley; Lisa X Jing; Christopher F Chabris; Thomas W Malone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Team Emotional Authenticity on Virtual Team Performance.

Authors:  Catherine E Connelly; Ofir Turel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-31

8.  What Arguments against COVID-19 Vaccines Run on Facebook in Poland: Content Analysis of Comments.

Authors:  Dominik Wawrzuta; Mariusz Jaworski; Joanna Gotlib; Mariusz Panczyk
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-10

9.  How Do Friends and Strangers Play the Game Taboo? A Study of Accuracy, Efficiency, Motivation, and the Use of Shared Knowledge.

Authors:  Monique M H Pollmann; Emiel J Krahmer
Journal:  J Lang Soc Psychol       Date:  2017-10-12

10.  Why are listeners sometimes (but not always) egocentric? Making inferences about using others' perspective in referential communication.

Authors:  J Jessica Wang; Natalia Ciranova; Bethany Woods; Ian A Apperly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.