A O T Mustonen1, S K Koskinen, M J Kiuru. 1. Helsinki Medical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Toolo Trauma Center, Helsinki, Finland. antti.mustonen@hus.fi
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings of acute knee trauma and to compare radiography with MDCT in patients referred to a level 1 trauma center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During a 5-year period, a total of 415 MDCT examinations were performed on 409 patients with acute knee trauma to reveal complex fracture anatomy or rule out a fracture. MDCT and primary radiographs were re-evaluated with respect to fracture location and trauma mechanism. Tibial plateau fractures were further analyzed depending on anatomical location: anterior-medial, anterior-lateral, posterior-lateral, and posterior-medial regions. Maximal depression of the tibial articular surface was measured. Findings on the primary knee radiographs were compared with MDCT findings. RESULTS: Of the 409 patients, 356 (87%) had a knee fracture. A total of 451 fractures were found in all anatomic regions: distal femur (n=49), proximal tibia (n=307), patella (n=23), and proximal fibula (n=72). Primary radiographs were available in 316 (76%) cases. Of these, 225 (71%) had MDCT in order to reveal the fracture anatomy better, and 91 (29%) had a subsequent MDCT after negative plain radiographs. Overall sensitivity of radiography was 83%, while negative predictive value was 49%. On radiography, tibial plateau articular depression was underestimated in all regions except when the fracture consisted of the whole half of the anterior or posterior plateau. The three main injury mechanisms were traffic accident, a simple fall, and sport. In 49 cases (15%), primary radiographs were suboptimal due to positioning. CONCLUSION: In severely injured patients, diagnostically sufficient radiographs are difficult to obtain, and therefore a negative radiograph is not reliable in ruling out a fracture. In these patients, MDCT is a fast and accurate examination and is also recommended in patients with tibial plateau fractures or complex knee injuries in order to evaluate the fracture adequately.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings of acute knee trauma and to compare radiography with MDCT in patients referred to a level 1 trauma center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During a 5-year period, a total of 415 MDCT examinations were performed on 409 patients with acute knee trauma to reveal complex fracture anatomy or rule out a fracture. MDCT and primary radiographs were re-evaluated with respect to fracture location and trauma mechanism. Tibial plateau fractures were further analyzed depending on anatomical location: anterior-medial, anterior-lateral, posterior-lateral, and posterior-medial regions. Maximal depression of the tibial articular surface was measured. Findings on the primary knee radiographs were compared with MDCT findings. RESULTS: Of the 409 patients, 356 (87%) had a knee fracture. A total of 451 fractures were found in all anatomic regions: distal femur (n=49), proximal tibia (n=307), patella (n=23), and proximal fibula (n=72). Primary radiographs were available in 316 (76%) cases. Of these, 225 (71%) had MDCT in order to reveal the fracture anatomy better, and 91 (29%) had a subsequent MDCT after negative plain radiographs. Overall sensitivity of radiography was 83%, while negative predictive value was 49%. On radiography, tibial plateau articular depression was underestimated in all regions except when the fracture consisted of the whole half of the anterior or posterior plateau. The three main injury mechanisms were traffic accident, a simple fall, and sport. In 49 cases (15%), primary radiographs were suboptimal due to positioning. CONCLUSION: In severely injured patients, diagnostically sufficient radiographs are difficult to obtain, and therefore a negative radiograph is not reliable in ruling out a fracture. In these patients, MDCT is a fast and accurate examination and is also recommended in patients with tibial plateau fractures or complex knee injuries in order to evaluate the fracture adequately.
Authors: Katrina N Glazebrook; Lee J Brewerton; Shuai Leng; Rickey E Carter; Peter C Rhee; Naveen S Murthy; B Mathew Howe; Michael D Ringler; Diane L Dahm; Michael J Stuart; Cynthia H McCollough; J G Fletcher Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2013-12-14 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Christian Booz; Jochen Nöske; Lukas Lenga; Simon S Martin; Ibrahim Yel; Katrin Eichler; Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Nicole Huizinga; Moritz H Albrecht; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Alexander S Spiro; Marc Regier; Alexander Novo de Oliveira; Eik Vettorazzi; Michael Hoffmann; Jan Philipp Petersen; Frank Oliver Henes; Thomas Demuth; Johannes M Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jan P Kolb; Marc Regier; Eik Vettorazzi; Norbert Stiel; Jan P Petersen; Cyrus Behzadi; Johannes M Rueger; Alexander S Spiro Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-07-29 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Clécio de Lima Lopes; Carlos Antônio da Rocha Cândido Filho; Thiago Almeida de Lima E Silva; Marcelo Carvalho Krause Gonçalves; Ricardo Lyra de Oliveira; Paulo Rogério Gomes de Lima Journal: Rev Bras Ortop Date: 2014-10-30