Literature DB >> 16391991

Efficacy of biphasic waveform compared to monophasic waveform for cardioversion of atrial flutter in pediatric patients.

A S Batra1, B S Hasan, R A Hurwitz.   

Abstract

The efficacy of biphasic waveform cardioversion of atrial flutter in pediatric patients has not previously been demonstrated. Cardioversion outcomes were compared in two sequential groups of patients with atrial flutter undergoing transthoracic cardioversion using monophasic and biphasic waveforms at a single pediatric institution. The mean energy required for procedural success was 1.7 +/- 1.2 J/kg in the monophasic group compared to 0.9 +/- 0.6 J/kg in the biphasic group (p = 0.002). The mean number of attempts before achieving procedural success was 1.9 +/- 1.2 for the monophasic group and 1.3 +/- 1.0 for the biphasic group (p = 0.019). Procedure success rate was 89.5% (33/38) in the monophasic group compared to 100% (27/27) in the biphasic group (p = 0.13). Success rate for biphasic waveform cardioversion was 83% (5/6) when using energy less than 0.5 J/kg. These findings provide the impetus for lower starting energies and more widespread use of devices utilizing biphasic waveforms in pediatric patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16391991     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-005-1112-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  7 in total

1.  Biphasic waveform cardioversion as an alternative to internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation refractory to conventional monophasic waveform transthoracic shock.

Authors:  D G Benditt; N Samniah; D Iskos; K G Lurie; B J Padanilam; S Sakaguchi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Efficacy of biphasic waveform cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter compared with conventional monophasic waveforms.

Authors:  Cengiz Ermis; Alan X Zhu; Sunil Sinha; Demosthenes Iskos; Scott Sakaguchi; Keith G Lurie; David G Benditt
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  MYOCARDIAL CHANGES AFTER DIRECT CURRENT ELECTROSHOCK.

Authors:  R M SUSSMAN; D H WOLDENBERG; M COHEN
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1964-09-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Comparative effects of carvedilol and amiodarone on conversion and recurrence rates of persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Kanoupakis; Emmanuel G Manios; Hercules E Mavrakis; Panos G Tzerakis; Helen K Mouloudi; Panos E Vardas
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Comparison of rectilinear biphasic waveform energy versus truncated exponential biphasic waveform energy for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Maureen L Kim; Soo G Kim; David S Park; Jay N Gross; Kevin J Ferrick; Eugen C Palma; John D Fisher
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Pediatric transthoracic defibrillation: biphasic versus monophasic waveforms in an experimental model.

Authors:  C B Clark; Y Zhang; L R Davies; G Karlsson; R E Kerber
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Myocardial necrosis from direct current countershock. Effect of paddle electrode size and time interval between discharges.

Authors:  C F Dahl; G A Ewy; E D Warner; E D Thomas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 29.690

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Elevated impedance during cardioversion in neonates with atrial flutter.

Authors:  Scott R Ceresnak; Thomas J Starc; Allan J Hordof; Robert H Pass; William J Bonney; Leonardo Liberman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 1.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.