Literature DB >> 16391970

Mapping stream habitats with a global positioning system: accuracy, precision, and comparison with traditional methods.

Daniel C Dauwalter1, William L Fisher, Kevin C Belt.   

Abstract

We tested the precision and accuracy of the Trimble GeoXTtrade mark global positioning system (GPS) handheld receiver on point and area features and compared estimates of stream habitat dimensions (e.g., lengths and areas of riffles and pools) that were made in three different Oklahoma streams using the GPS receiver and a tape measure. The precision of differentially corrected GPS (DGPS) points was not affected by the number of GPS position fixes (i.e., geographic location estimates) averaged per DGPS point. Horizontal error of points ranged from 0.03 to 2.77 m and did not differ with the number of position fixes per point. The error of area measurements ranged from 0.1% to 110.1% but decreased as the area increased. Again, error was independent of the number of position fixes averaged per polygon corner. The estimates of habitat lengths, widths, and areas did not differ when measured using two methods of data collection (GPS and a tape measure), nor did the differences among methods change at three stream sites with contrasting morphologies. Measuring features with a GPS receiver was up to 3.3 times faster on average than using a tape measure, although signal interference from high streambanks or overhanging vegetation occasionally limited satellite signal availability and prolonged measurements with a GPS receiver. There were also no differences in precision of habitat dimensions when mapped using a continuous versus a position fix average GPS data collection method. Despite there being some disadvantages to using the GPS in stream habitat studies, measuring stream habitats with a GPS resulted in spatially referenced data that allowed the assessment of relative habitat position and changes in habitats over time, and was often faster than using a tape measure. For most spatial scales of interest, the precision and accuracy of DGPS data are adequate and have logistical advantages when compared to traditional methods of measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16391970     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0270-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  2 in total

1.  Spectrally driven classification of high spatial resolution, hyperspectral imagery: a tool for mapping in-stream habitat.

Authors:  Carl J Legleiter
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.

Authors:  M G Kenward; J H Roger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Patch size and shape influence the accuracy of mapping small habitat patches with a global positioning system.

Authors:  Daniel C Dauwalter; Frank J Rahel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Mixed-grass prairie canopy structure and spectral reflectance vary with topographic position.

Authors:  Rebecca L Phillips; Moffatt K Ngugi; John Hendrickson; Aaron Smith; Mark West
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 3.266

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.