Literature DB >> 16391941

[Current status of standard and endovascular varicosity surgery].

T Noppeney1, H Nüllen.   

Abstract

The classical varicose vein operation represents the "gold standard" in the operative approach to this condition. The results of the standard procedure are very good especially with regard to complications. The recurrence rate is estimated between 6% and 60%, but the true rate is unknown, since there is no generally accepted definition of recurrent varicosities. Endovascular procedures for the elimination of the superficial venous system - radiofrequency obliteration and laser therapy - have established themselves as alternative, minimal invasive procedures. Good results up to 2 years post operatively have been documented; for radiofrequency obliteration, very good results 5 years after surgery are available. Less well-known procedures are available, such as the CHIVA method, which represents a totally different pathophysiological concept. Data on the efficacy of this method are limited, making an evaluation difficult. The spectrum of operative treatment methods of the superficial venous system and its side branches has increased tremendously because of new technical developments. The surgeon must inform the patient about the pros and cons of each procedure and the anticipated results, as well as making an accurate decision as to which methods are best suited for the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16391941     DOI: 10.1007/s00105-005-1083-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hautarzt        ISSN: 0017-8470            Impact factor:   0.751


  23 in total

1.  [Development of large vein surgery in Europe].

Authors:  W Hach
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS), a consensus document. REVAS group.

Authors:  M R Perrin; J J Guex; C V Ruckley; R G dePalma; J P Royle; B Eklof; P Nicolini; G Jantet
Journal:  Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-06

3.  Endovenous laser photocoagulation (EVLP) for varicose veins.

Authors:  Cheng-Jen Chang; Jun-Jin Chua
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Comparison of endovenous radiofrequency versus 810 nm diode laser occlusion of large veins in an animal model.

Authors:  Robert A Weiss
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.398

5.  [Complications in varicose vein operations].

Authors:  K Balzer
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 0.942

6.  The effect of long saphenous vein stripping on quality of life.

Authors:  R K MacKenzie; A Paisley; P L Allan; A J Lee; C V Ruckley; A W Bradbury
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up.

Authors:  F Lurie; D Creton; B Eklof; L S Kabnick; R L Kistner; O Pichot; C Sessa; S Schuller-Petrovic
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.069

8.  Durability of reflux-elimination by a minimal invasive CHIVA procedure on patients with varicose veins. A 3-year prospective case study.

Authors:  J M Escribano; J Juan; R Bofill; J Maeso; A Rodríguez-Mori; M Matas
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.069

9.  Infrequent early recanalization of greater saphenous vein after endovenous laser treatment.

Authors:  T M Proebstle; D Gül; H A Lehr; A Kargl; J Knop
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Saphenous vein sparing surgery: principles, techniques and results.

Authors:  P Zamboni; M G Marcellino; M Cappelli; C V Feo; V Bresadola; G Vasquez; A Liboni
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.888

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.