BACKGROUND: Studies in the northern and southern hemispheres consistently identified seasonal influences on monthly and semester suicide distribution. The variations of sunlight exposure in zones of increasing latitude has been suggested as one of the most plausible explanations for this phenomenon. Some recent studies in the northern hemisphere could not find seasonal asymmetries of suicides. The current study examines the monthly, seasonal and semester distribution of suicidal deaths in Chile and the influence of seasons in zones of low latitude as compared with regions of high or very high latitude, trying to determine if a seasonal pattern still exists in a country of the southern hemisphere. METHODS: Monthly, seasonal and semester suicidal data over the period 1995-1999 were examined for the whole sample and for gender-specific subgroups in Chile. Four different latitudinal zones were analyzed separately, in order to investigate the effect of the photoperiod on suicide distribution. Results were analyzed by chi(2) tests for multinomials, as an overall measure of deviation. RESULTS: We found a significant unimodal springtime peak for both genders in the global territory. Among the 4,710 male and 829 female suicides reported in this period there were no gender differences in the seasonal pattern of suicidal deaths. When divided into four different latitudinal zones, the regions with low latitude (north of the country) showed no significant differences, while central and southern zones (higher latitude) show a significant springtime pattern. In the extreme south of the country, no significant differences were found, probably due to the very small number of cases. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the existence of a unimodal springtime peak of suicides in Chile, but not in the zone of low latitude. Results support the notion that the seasonal impact on suicidal distribution is a function of photoperiod.
BACKGROUND: Studies in the northern and southern hemispheres consistently identified seasonal influences on monthly and semester suicide distribution. The variations of sunlight exposure in zones of increasing latitude has been suggested as one of the most plausible explanations for this phenomenon. Some recent studies in the northern hemisphere could not find seasonal asymmetries of suicides. The current study examines the monthly, seasonal and semester distribution of suicidal deaths in Chile and the influence of seasons in zones of low latitude as compared with regions of high or very high latitude, trying to determine if a seasonal pattern still exists in a country of the southern hemisphere. METHODS: Monthly, seasonal and semester suicidal data over the period 1995-1999 were examined for the whole sample and for gender-specific subgroups in Chile. Four different latitudinal zones were analyzed separately, in order to investigate the effect of the photoperiod on suicide distribution. Results were analyzed by chi(2) tests for multinomials, as an overall measure of deviation. RESULTS: We found a significant unimodal springtime peak for both genders in the global territory. Among the 4,710 male and 829 female suicides reported in this period there were no gender differences in the seasonal pattern of suicidal deaths. When divided into four different latitudinal zones, the regions with low latitude (north of the country) showed no significant differences, while central and southern zones (higher latitude) show a significant springtime pattern. In the extreme south of the country, no significant differences were found, probably due to the very small number of cases. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the existence of a unimodal springtime peak of suicides in Chile, but not in the zone of low latitude. Results support the notion that the seasonal impact on suicidal distribution is a function of photoperiod.
Authors: Simone De Jong; Marjolein Neeleman; Jurjen J Luykx; Maarten J ten Berg; Eric Strengman; Hanneke H Den Breeijen; Leon C Stijvers; Jacobine E Buizer-Voskamp; Steven C Bakker; René S Kahn; Steve Horvath; Wouter W Van Solinge; Roel A Ophoff Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Daniel König; Josef Baumgartner; Victor Blüml; Andrés Heerlein; Carlos Téllez; Nicole Baus; Nestor D Kapusta Journal: Neuropsychiatr Date: 2017-03-29
Authors: Jurjen J Luykx; Steven C Bakker; Eef Lentjes; Marco P M Boks; Nan van Geloven; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Esther Janson; Eric Strengman; Anne M de Lepper; Herman Westenberg; Kai E Klopper; Hendrik J Hoorn; Harry P M M Gelissen; Julian Jordan; Noortje M Tolenaar; Eric P A van Dongen; Bregt Michel; Lucija Abramovic; Steve Horvath; Teus Kappen; Peter Bruins; Peter Keijzers; Paul Borgdorff; Roel A Ophoff; René S Kahn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: J J Luykx; S C Bakker; N van Geloven; M J C Eijkemans; S Horvath; E Lentjes; M P M Boks; E Strengman; J DeYoung; J E Buizer-Voskamp; R M Cantor; A Lu; E P A van Dongen; P Borgdorff; P Bruins; R S Kahn; R A Ophoff Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-08 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Isaia Chatzikosta; Konstantinos Pastiadis; Prodromos Zanis; Wolfram Kawohl; Ad J F M Kerkhof; Alvydas Navickas; Cyril Höschl; Dusica Lecic-Tosevski; Eliot Sorel; Elmars Rancans; Eva Palova; Georg Juckel; Goran Isacsson; Helena Korosec Jagodic; Ileana Botezat-Antonescu; Janusz Rybakowski; Jean Michel Azorin; John Cookson; John Waddington; Peter Pregelj; Koen Demyttenaere; Luchezar G Hranov; Lidija Injac Stevovic; Lucas Pezawas; Marc Adida; Maria Luisa Figuera; Miro Jakovljević; Monica Vichi; Giulio Perugi; Ole A Andreassen; Olivera Vukovic; Paraskevi Mavrogiorgou; Peeter Varnik; Peter Dome; Petr Winkler; Raimo K R Salokangas; Tiina From; Vita Danileviciute; Xenia Gonda; Zoltan Rihmer; Jonas Forsman; Anne Grady; Thomas Hyphantis; Ingrid Dieset; Susan Soendergaard; Maurizio Pompili; Per Bech Journal: Ann Gen Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.455