Literature DB >> 16390892

Psychomotor slowing as a predictor of fluoxetine nonresponse in depressed outpatients.

Bonnie P Taylor1, Gerard E Bruder, Jonathan W Stewart, Patrick J McGrath, Jeffrey Halperin, Howard Ehrlichman, Frederic M Quitkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the utility of baseline psychomotor speed, measured with neuropsychological tests, to predict fluoxetine response in moderately depressed outpatients. The authors hypothesized that since psychomotor slowing in depressed patients has been linked to reduced dopaminergic neurotransmission, patients with slowing would be unresponsive to fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
METHOD: After baseline neuropsychological testing, patients were treated openly with fluoxetine for 12 weeks. Thirty-seven patients completed the trial.
RESULTS: Compared to the 25 patients who responded, the 12 patients who did not respond to fluoxetine exhibited significantly poorer performance in verbal fluency on the Controlled Oral Word Association Test FAS and in color naming on the Stroop Color and Word Test. In addition, the nonresponders tended to perform worse than the responders on the Stroop Color and Word Test reading subtest and the WAIS-III digit symbol subtest. Differential treatment response was specific to psychomotor speed because responders and nonresponders did not perform differently on tasks of executive functioning, attention, visuospatial functioning, or verbal intelligence.
CONCLUSIONS: Psychomotor slowing may identify a subgroup of depressed patients who have a dopaminergic deficit that is unresponsive to fluoxetine monotherapy and who should therefore receive an alternative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16390892     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  33 in total

Review 1.  A Meta-Analysis of Executive Dysfunction and Antidepressant Treatment Response in Late-Life Depression.

Authors:  Monique A Pimontel; David Rindskopf; Bret R Rutherford; Patrick J Brown; Steven P Roose; Joel R Sneed
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.105

2.  A computational analysis of flanker interference in depression.

Authors:  D G Dillon; T Wiecki; P Pechtel; C Webb; F Goer; L Murray; M Trivedi; M Fava; P J McGrath; M Weissman; R Parsey; B Kurian; P Adams; T Carmody; S Weyandt; K Shores-Wilson; M Toups; M McInnis; M A Oquendo; C Cusin; P Deldin; G Bruder; D A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Neurocognitive effects of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: association with antidepressant response.

Authors:  James W Murrough; Le-Ben Wan; Brian Iacoviello; Katherine A Collins; Carly Solon; Benjamin Glicksberg; Andrew M Perez; Sanjay J Mathew; Dennis S Charney; Dan V Iosifescu; Katherine E Burdick
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Electroencephalographic alpha measures predict therapeutic response to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant: pre- and post-treatment findings.

Authors:  Gerard E Bruder; James P Sedoruk; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Frederic M Quitkin; Craig E Tenke
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 5.  Psychomotor retardation in depression: biological underpinnings, measurement, and treatment.

Authors:  Jeylan S Buyukdura; Shawn M McClintock; Paul E Croarkin
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 5.067

Review 6.  Progress in Elucidating Biomarkers of Antidepressant Pharmacological Treatment Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Last 15 Years.

Authors:  G Voegeli; M L Cléry-Melin; N Ramoz; P Gorwood
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Pretreatment Reward Sensitivity and Frontostriatal Resting-State Functional Connectivity Are Associated With Response to Bupropion After Sertraline Nonresponse.

Authors:  Yuen-Siang Ang; Roselinde Kaiser; Thilo Deckersbach; Jorge Almeida; Mary L Phillips; Henry W Chase; Christian A Webb; Ramin Parsey; Maurizio Fava; Patrick McGrath; Myrna Weissman; Phil Adams; Patricia Deldin; Maria A Oquendo; Melvin G McInnis; Thomas Carmody; Gerard Bruder; Crystal M Cooper; Cherise R Chin Fatt; Madhukar H Trivedi; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Neuropsychological characteristics as predictors of SSRI treatment response in depressed subjects.

Authors:  Marianne Gorlyn; John G Keilp; Michael F Grunebaum; Bonnie P Taylor; Maria A Oquendo; Gerard E Bruder; Jonathan W Stewart; Gil Zalsman; J John Mann
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Neurocognitive predictors of antidepressant clinical response.

Authors:  Gerard E Bruder; Jorge E Alvarenga; Daniel Alschuler; Karen Abraham; John G Keilp; David J Hellerstein; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Predicting therapeutic response to secondary treatment with bupropion: dichotic listening tests of functional brain asymmetry.

Authors:  Gerard E Bruder; Jonathan W Stewart; Jennifer D Schaller; Patrick J McGrath
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.