Literature DB >> 16390643

Shock absorption during forefoot running and its relationship to medial longitudinal arch height.

Adrian Lees1, Mark Lake, Leslie Klenerman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overuse injuries to the lower extremity have often been connected with the repetitive loading of the foot and in particular its ability to absorb shock. The shock absorbing ability of the foot is thought to relate to its structure, particularly the height of the medial longitudinal arch. The purpose of this study was to investigate the shock absorption characteristics of the foot in forefoot running as measured by the dynamic load rate of the vertical ground reaction forces during the early stages of ground contact and to relate these characteristics to the height of the medial longitudinal arch.
METHODS: Eighteen normal athletic adult volunteers were used as subjects and all had clinically normal feet. An Arch Index was computed from lateral radiographs taken with the foot in a full weightbearing position. Dynamic load rate was computed as the first differential of the vertical force as measured by a Kistler force platform. Each subject performed ten trials of running at a speed of 3 m.s-1 using forefoot running style.
RESULTS: The dynamic load rate showed three definite peaks (mean 93, 18, and 16 kNs-1 respectively), and two intervening troughs (mean 18 and 3 kNs-1 respectively), showing that the process of shock absorption was one that was progressive over the foot loading phase. The time at which these features occurred indicated a consistency in process of shock absorption. However, none of the force peaks or load rate peaks correlated with the Arch Index.
CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the structure of the foot as characterized by the Arch Index, was not the major factor in determining the way in which force is transmitted to the musculoskeletal system in forefoot running. These findings support the concept that the height of the arch, although a commonly used clinical descriptor of foot type does not appear to be important in defining the functional capacity of the foot in action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16390643     DOI: 10.1177/107110070502601214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  9 in total

1.  Increased medial longitudinal arch mobility, lower extremity kinematics, and ground reaction forces in high-arched runners.

Authors:  D S Blaise Williams; Robin N Tierney; Robert J Butler
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Height of the foot longitudinal arch and anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  Paulo César de César; Jairo André de Oliveira Alves; João Luiz Ellera Gomes
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

3.  Generalized joint laxity associated with increased medial foot loading in female athletes.

Authors:  Kim D Barber Foss; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Intrinsic Foot Muscle Activation During Specific Exercises: A T2 Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Thomas M Gooding; Mark A Feger; Joseph M Hart; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  The Effect of an Inclined Ankle on the Activation of the Abductor Hallucis Muscle during Short Foot Exercise.

Authors:  Hyo-Jin Heo; Duk-Hyun An
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-04-23

6.  Relationships between static foot alignment and dynamic plantar loads in runners with acute and chronic stages of plantar fasciitis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ana P Ribeiro; Isabel C N Sacco; Roberto C Dinato; Silvia M A João
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Determining the knee joint laxity between the pronated foot and normal arched foot in adult participants.

Authors:  Fayez Alahmri; Saad Alsaadi; Mohammad Ahsan; Sarah Alqhtani
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-07-01

8.  The effects of gluteus maximus and abductor hallucis strengthening exercises for four weeks on navicular drop and lower extremity muscle activity during gait with flatfoot.

Authors:  Young-Mi Goo; Tae-Ho Kim; Jin-Yong Lim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-03-31

9.  Does Arch Stiffness Influence Running Spatiotemporal Parameters? An Analysis of the Relationship between Influencing Factors on Running Performance.

Authors:  Felipe García-Pinillos; Diego Jaén-Carrillo; Pedro Ángel Latorre-Román; Carles Escalona-Marfil; Víctor M Soto-Hermoso; Carlos Lago-Fuentes; Silvia Pueyo-Villa; Irma Domínguez-Azpíroz; Luis E Roche-Seruendo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.