Literature DB >> 16390642

The midtarsal joint locking mechanism.

C Brian Blackwood1, Tracy J Yuen, Bruce J Sangeorzan, William R Ledoux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The midtarsal joint, consisting of the talo-navicular and the calcaneocuboid joints, is presumed to be responsible for the foot being both flexible and rigid during different parts of the stance phase of gait. However, this mechanism has never been well quantified. This study explores the midtarsal joint locking mechanism by comparing the effect of hindfoot inversion and eversion on midfoot and forefoot mobility.
METHODS: Motion of the tibia, talus, calcaneus, navicular, cuboid and the first, second, and fifth metatarsals were measured in nine cadaver feet using Polhemus Fastrak electromagnetic sensors (EST GmbH and Co. KG, Kaiserslautern, Germany). The talus was fixed to the tibia, and then the forefoot was maximally dorsiflexed, plantarflexed, inverted, and everted, with the hindfoot in maximal eversion and inversion, for a total of eight test positions. The range of motion of the individual bones between maximal forefoot dorsiflexion and plantarflexion and between maximal forefoot inversion and eversion was calculated for the hindfoot in maximal eversion and inversion.
RESULTS: For the range of motion from maximal dorsiflexion to maximal plantarflexion there was significantly increased movement of the first, second, and fifth metatarsals in the sagittal plane (p-value = 0.003, 0.007, and 0.002, respectively) when the calcaneus was maximally everted compared to when the calcaneus was maximally inverted. No significant differences were detected for the range of motion from forefoot inversion to eversion for the two hindfoot positions.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that motion in the forefoot is influenced by hindfoot position through the midtarsal joint. Specifically, the sagittal plane range of motion of the metatarsals is increased when the hindfoot is in valgus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16390642     DOI: 10.1177/107110070502601213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  23 in total

1.  Choosing among 3 ankle-foot orthoses for a patient with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher G Neville; Jeff R Houck
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  The inter-relationship of clinical parameters in congenital talipes equinovarus: relevance to pathological anatomy and clinical classification.

Authors:  I Siddique; Q Choudry; R W Paton
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Effect of ankle-foot orthotic devices on foot kinematics in Stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher Neville; Frederick R Lemley
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Kinematics of primate midfoot flexibility.

Authors:  Thomas M Greiner; Kevin A Ball
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Planar covariation of limb elevation angles during bipedal walking in the Japanese macaque.

Authors:  Naomichi Ogihara; Takeo Kikuchi; Yutaro Ishiguro; Haruyuki Makishima; Masato Nakatsukasa
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Midtarsal locking, the windlass mechanism, and running strike pattern: A kinematic and kinetic assessment.

Authors:  Dustin A Bruening; Michael B Pohl; Kota Z Takahashi; Joaquin A Barrios
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  An Ankle-Foot Orthosis With a Lateral Extension Reduces Forefoot Abduction in Subjects With Stage II Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher Neville; Mary Bucklin; Nathaniel Ordway; Frederick Lemley
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Relationships between segmental foot mobility and plantar loading in individuals with and without diabetes and neuropathy.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Charles L Saltzman; H John Yack
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Foot kinematics during a bilateral heel rise test in participants with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Christopher Neville; Josh Tome; A Samuel Flemister
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Ankle and foot kinematics associated with stage II PTTD during stance.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Christopher G Neville; Josh Tome; Adolph S Flemister
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.