| Literature DB >> 16390549 |
Neil Andersson1, Steven Mitchell.
Abstract
Evaluation of mine risk education in Afghanistan used population weighted raster maps as an evaluation tool to assess mine education performance, coverage and costs. A stratified last-stage random cluster sample produced representative data on mine risk and exposure to education. Clusters were weighted by the population they represented, rather than the land area. A "friction surface" hooked the population weight into interpolation of cluster-specific indicators. The resulting population weighted raster contours offer a model of the population effects of landmine risks and risk education. Five indicator levels ordered the evidence from simple description of the population-weighted indicators (level 0), through risk analysis (levels 1-3) to modelling programme investment and local variations (level 4). Using graphic overlay techniques, it was possible to metamorphose the map, portraying the prediction of what might happen over time, based on the causality models developed in the epidemiological analysis. Based on a lattice of local site-specific predictions, each cluster being a small universe, the "average" prediction was immediately interpretable without losing the spatial complexity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16390549 PMCID: PMC1352365 DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-5-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Health Geogr ISSN: 1476-072X Impact factor: 3.918
The CIET fact-finding/feedback cycle
| 1. Identification of the issue to be researched, for example, access to water and sanitation, access to and use of services, adequate food supply, etc. |
| 2. Ordering and analysis of data from routine sources and previous studies, attempting to align data in three analytical categories: impact, coverage, and costs. |
| 3. Development of the instruments including precise objectives, questionnaire, key informant interviews, data entry format, and report outline. |
| 4. Pilot testing including data entry and analysis. |
| 5. Fieldwork including household questionnaires and qualitative techniques (key informants, observation, focus group discussions). |
| 6. Data entry and preliminary analysis, identification of confounders and effect modifiers. |
| 7. Feedback and interaction in sentinel communities for interpretation and strategy development. |
| 8. Completion of analysis, refinement of programme options. |
| 9. Development of the communication strategy that can be consultative process in the same clusters. |
| 10. Communication of results to all communities, development of strategies of action to resolve issues. |
Figure 1Layers in a population-weighted raster, based on a cluster sample. a) position of sentinel sites or "tent-poles", b) population weights, c) friction layers and d) raster drape (top) where the shade is set by the height of the tent-pole and the extension of an interpolation based on the population weights.
Figure 3Schematic portrayal of a raster being laid over a weight layer. The interpolation of the colour change is based on the population weight.
Figure 4Raster map showing Level 0 indicator. Population-weighted distribution of listenership to BBC soap opera New Home New Life including ortho (three-dimensional) view.
Five levels of indicators for planning
| Level 0: Descriptive frequencies (percentages, rates) and characteristics (averages, modal values) provide an overview of the occurrence a given risk-taking behaviour, or the coverage of a given health programme. |
| Level 1: Individual risk estimates (unbiased odds ratios) reflect the average risk of an individual "exposed" to a given mine awareness programme, in comparison with the average unexposed individual. |
| Level 2: The expected gains are the number of cases that can be "saved" – after taking into account all the other factors that could explain the association – by a given intervention. |
| Level 3: Combinations of programmes can produce additive or multiplicative gains, which are enormously important in estimating the cost options for planners. |
| Level 4: Since is it rarely possible to invest fully in all programme options simultaneously, this models programme structure based on |
Evidence of impact of New Home New Life on the number of mine/UXO events before and after 1994, upper limb (tampering) injuries after 1994 and inappropriate attitudes and practices
| Listen to | ||
| yes | no | |
| Mine/UXO events | 21 (6.802) | 9 (1.898) |
| 2. Cases 1994–97 (per 10000 person years) | 9 (14.577) | 14 (14.763) |
| 3. Upper limb injuries as proportion of all injuries among survivors of mine accidents after 1994 | 3/14 (21%) | 11/16 (69%) |
| Inappropriate attitudes and practices (search for metal, consider non-qualified person brave if go into mined area) | ||
| 4. With easy radio access (%) | 377/4207 (9%) | 65/423 (15.4%) |
| 5. Difficult radio access (%) | 2/83 (2.4%) | 378/4216 (9%) |
Expected gains table (reduction in inappropriate behaviour) of BBC listenership and direct training
| Actions | Odds Ratio (average individual risk) | Risk difference | Proportion requiring intervention | Gain**/1000 households |
| Universal listenership to the BBC | 0.61 | 0.046 | 53% current non-listeners | 24.3 |
| Stop or change current direct training programme* | 0.57 | 0.044 | 32% in communities now exposed | 14.1 |
| Universal listenership | 0.52 | 0.066 | 67% is either non-listener or is exposed to training | 44.2 |
*each excluding the effect of the others and the confounding effect of 'easy access to radios'
** 'Gain' is the risk difference divided by the proportion requiring intervention