OBJECTIVE: To establish whether an intra-oral lubricating device for dry mouth alters the oral environment. DESIGN: A single-blind randomized cross-over study. METHOD: Twenty-nine dentate subjects from the Sjogren's syndrome clinic attended on five occasions at 4-week intervals. They were randomized, having the device fitted on either the second or the fourth visit for the experimental period, whilst using their preferred method of lubrication throughout the rest of the study. The preferred methods of lubrication were either water (group 1, n = 10) or saliva substitute (group 2, n = 9) or sugar-free chewing gum (group 3, n = 10). At each visit microbiological, unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples were collected. Dry mouth score, speech test and periodontal indices were recorded. RESULTS: The water lubrication group (1) had a resting salivary flow greater than lubrication groups (2 and 3) by post-ANOVA contrasts (P < 0.001). The postdevice data also demonstrated a salivary flow greater than lubrication group (3) by post-ANOVA contrasts (P < 0.05). The epithelial cell count using the Spearman correlation was high, possibly reflecting increased viscosity of the saliva (P = 0.044). The speech test indicated that the experimental subjects had difficulty in speaking (P = 0.001). This was slightly easier postdevice wear. Streptococcus mutans (P = 0.009) and Lactobacillus (P = 0.058) increased in the saliva after wearing the device. Salivary flow rate, Candida albicans, oral dryness, speaking and periodontal indices were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The oral environment was altered by wearing a lubricating device with an increase in the numbers of Strep. mutans and Lactobacillus. Clinical dryness and speech test correlated with the mean whole salivary flow suggesting a screening method for xerostomia.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To establish whether an intra-oral lubricating device for dry mouth alters the oral environment. DESIGN: A single-blind randomized cross-over study. METHOD: Twenty-nine dentate subjects from the Sjogren's syndrome clinic attended on five occasions at 4-week intervals. They were randomized, having the device fitted on either the second or the fourth visit for the experimental period, whilst using their preferred method of lubrication throughout the rest of the study. The preferred methods of lubrication were either water (group 1, n = 10) or saliva substitute (group 2, n = 9) or sugar-free chewing gum (group 3, n = 10). At each visit microbiological, unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples were collected. Dry mouth score, speech test and periodontal indices were recorded. RESULTS: The water lubrication group (1) had a resting salivary flow greater than lubrication groups (2 and 3) by post-ANOVA contrasts (P < 0.001). The postdevice data also demonstrated a salivary flow greater than lubrication group (3) by post-ANOVA contrasts (P < 0.05). The epithelial cell count using the Spearman correlation was high, possibly reflecting increased viscosity of the saliva (P = 0.044). The speech test indicated that the experimental subjects had difficulty in speaking (P = 0.001). This was slightly easier postdevice wear. Streptococcus mutans (P = 0.009) and Lactobacillus (P = 0.058) increased in the saliva after wearing the device. Salivary flow rate, Candida albicans, oral dryness, speaking and periodontal indices were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The oral environment was altered by wearing a lubricating device with an increase in the numbers of Strep. mutans and Lactobacillus. Clinical dryness and speech test correlated with the mean whole salivary flow suggesting a screening method for xerostomia.
Authors: Laura S Sasportas; Drew N Hosford; Maria A Sodini; Dale J Waters; Elizabeth A Zambricki; Joëlle K Barral; Edward E Graves; Todd J Brinton; Paul G Yock; Quynh-Thu Le; Davud Sirjani Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Date: 2013-05-03
Authors: Katie L Hackett; Katherine H O Deane; Victoria Strassheim; Vincent Deary; Tim Rapley; Julia L Newton; Wan-Fai Ng Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 7.580