Literature DB >> 16390055

Tuning the photoinduced O2-evolving reactivity of Mn4O47+, Mn4O46+, and Mn4O3(OH)6+ manganese-oxo cubane complexes.

Jian-Zhong Wu1, Filippo De Angelis, Thomas G Carrell, Glenn P A Yap, John Sheats, Roberto Car, G Charles Dismukes.   

Abstract

The manganese-oxo "cubane" core complex Mn(4)O(4)L(1)(6) (1, L(1) = Ph(2)PO(2-)), a partial model of the photosynthetic water oxidation site, was shown previously to undergo photodissociation in the gas phase by releasing one phosphinate anion, an O(2) molecule, and the intact butterfly core cation (Mn(4)O(2)L(1)(5+)). Herein, we investigate the photochemistry and electronic structure of a series of manganese-oxo cubane complexes: [Mn(4)O(4)L(2)(6)] (2), 1(+)(ClO(4-)), 2(+)(ClO(4-)), and Mn(4)O(3)(OH)L(1)(6) (1H). We report the atomic structure of [Mn(4)O(4)L(2)(6)](ClO(4)), 2(+)(ClO(4-)) [L(2) = (4-MeOPh)(2)PO(2-)]. UV photoexcitation of a charge-transfer band dissociates one phosphinate, two core oxygen atoms, and the Mn(4)O(2)L(5)(+) butterfly as the dominant (or exclusive) photoreaction of all cubane derivatives in the gas phase, with relative yields: 1H >> 2 > 1 > 2(+) > 1(+). The photodissociation yield increases upon (1) reducing the core oxidation state by hydrogenation of a corner oxo (1H), (2) increasing the electron donation from the phosphinate ligand (L(2)), and (3) reducing the net charge from +1 to 0. The experimental Mn-O bond lengths and Mn-O bond strengths and the calculated ligand binding energy explain these trends in terms of weaker binding of phosphinate L(2) versus L(1) by 14.7 kcal/mol and stronger Mn-(mu(3)-O)(core) bonds in the oxidized complexes 2(+) and 1(+) versus 2 and 1. The calculated electronic structure accounts for these trends in terms of the binding energy and antibonding Mn-O(core) and Mn-O'(ligand) character of the degenerate highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), including (1) energetic destabilization of the HOMO of 2 relative to 1 by 0.75 eV and (2) depopulation of the antibonding HOMO and increased ionic binding in 1(+) and 2(+) versus 1 and 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16390055     DOI: 10.1021/ic051587r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0020-1669            Impact factor:   5.165


  5 in total

1.  Functional Models for the Oxygen-Evolving Complex of Photosystem II.

Authors:  Clyde W Cady; Robert H Crabtree; Gary W Brudvig
Journal:  Coord Chem Rev       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 22.315

2.  Copper(I) Complexes of N-(2-{[(2E)-2-(4-Nitrobenzylidenyl)Hydrazinyl]Carbonyl}Phenyl)Benzamide and Triphenylphosphine: Synthesis, Characterization and Luminescence Properties.

Authors:  S S Chavan; S B Pawal; M S More; A C Willis
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Reflections on Small Molecule Manganese Models that Seek to Mimic Photosynthetic Water Oxidation Chemistry.

Authors:  Christopher S Mullins; Vincent L Pecoraro
Journal:  Coord Chem Rev       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 22.315

Review 4.  Why did Nature choose manganese to make oxygen?

Authors:  Fraser A Armstrong
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Jahn-Teller Effects in a Vanadate-Stabilized Manganese-Oxo Cubane Water Oxidation Catalyst.

Authors:  Sebastian Mai; Marcus Holzer; Anastasia Andreeva; Leticia González
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 5.020

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.