Literature DB >> 16389896

Is insulin detemir able to favor a lower variability in the action of injected insulin in diabetic subjects?

P Valensi1, E Cosson.   

Abstract

Insulin treated diabetic patients have often to contend with variability in the action of injected insulin and to some unpredictibility in glycemic control. The variability in blood glucose control seems particularly important with long-acting insulins. Insulin detemir belongs to a new class of non-crystalline form of long-acting insulin analogs. Absorption of insulin detemir is dependent on neither appropriate resuspension before injection and dissolution of crystals in the subcutaneous tissue, as is the case for NPH insulin, nor on formation and dissolution of microprecipitates, as is the case for insulin glargine. In euglycemic glucose clamp studies, insulin detemir was associated with significantly less within-subjects variability for the pharmacodynamic endpoints than both NPH insulin and insulin glargine. Three, up to 6 months trials, carried out in patients with type 1 diabetes have shown that the day-to-day within-subject variations in plasma glucose were significantly lower with insulin detemir than with human NPH insulin. Similar results have been reported in patients with type 2 diabetes. Nightly 8-h plasma glucose recordings showed a smoother and more stable profile with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin. In patients with type 1 diabetes the combination of insulin detemir with mealtime insulin aspart, a fast-acting insulin analog, provides a smoother and more stable profile with lower post-prandial plasma glucose levels that the combination of NPH insulin with regular human insulin before each meal. In several trials, the risk of hypoglycemia, particularly of nocturnal hypoglycemia, was significantly lower with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin. In conclusion insulin detemir offers a better reproducibility as compared with other basal insulins, reduces the risk of hypoglycemia, and may lead the patients to titrate their insulin doses more easily and therefore to achieve more often glycemic objectives. The combination of rapid- and long-acting insulin analogs reproduces a more physiological insulin secretion and thereby reduces the risk of hypoglycemia and improves the overall 24-h glycemic profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16389896     DOI: 10.1016/s1262-3636(05)88265-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab        ISSN: 1262-3636            Impact factor:   6.041


  8 in total

1.  Insulin Detemir in Combination with Oral Antidiabetic Drugs Improves Glycemic Control in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes in Near East Countries: Results from the Lebanese Subgroup.

Authors:  Akram Echtay; Emile Andari; Paola Atallah; Roland Moufarrege; Rita Nemr
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  National trends in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 1994-2007.

Authors:  G Caleb Alexander; Niraj L Sehgal; Rachael M Moloney; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-27

3.  Comparative risks of diabetes-related complications of basal insulins: a longitudinal population-based cohort of type 1 diabetes 1999-2013 in Taiwan.

Authors:  Huang-Tz Ou; Tsung-Ying Lee; Ye-Fong Du; Chung-Yi Li
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Cost-effectiveness of long-acting insulin analogues vs intermediate/long-acting human insulin for type 1 diabetes: A population-based cohort followed over 10 years.

Authors:  Tsung-Ying Lee; Shihchen Kuo; Chen-Yi Yang; Huang-Tz Ou
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Safety, effectiveness, and cost of long-acting versus intermediate-acting insulin for type 1 diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Huda M Ashoor; Charlene Soobiah; Brenda Hemmelgarn; David Moher; Brian Hutton; Catherine H Yu; Sumit R Majumdar; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-10

Review 6.  Safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of long acting versus intermediate acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Huda M Ashoor; Jesmin Antony; Joseph Beyene; Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Alana Harrington; Charlotte Wilson; Sophia Tsouros; Charlene Soobiah; Catherine H Yu; Brian Hutton; Jeffrey S Hoch; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; David Moher; Sumit R Majumdar; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-10-01

7.  Comparison of a multiple daily insulin injection regimen (glargine or detemir once daily plus prandial insulin aspart) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (aspart) in short-term intensive insulin therapy for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors:  Wen-Shan Lv; Li Li; Jun-Ping Wen; Rong-Fang Pan; Rui-Xia Sun; Jing Wang; Yu-Xin Xian; Cai-Xia Cao; Yan-Yan Gao
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.257

8.  Clinical safety of insulin detemir in patients with Type 2 diabetes in the Gulf countries: The multicenter, noninterventional, open-label LevSafe study.

Authors:  Abdel Rahman El Shiekh; Hesham A Farrag; Tarek Ashour; Khalid Zaki Alshali; Waleed AbdelFattah
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.