Literature DB >> 16389890

The effect of somatic symptom attribution on the prevalence rate of depression and anxiety among nursing home patients.

Martin Smalbrugge1, Anne Margriet Pot, Lineke Jongenelis, Aartjan T F Beekman, Jan A Eefsting.   

Abstract

The validity of diagnostic psychiatric instruments for depression and anxiety disorders may be compromised among patients with complex physical illness and disability. The objective of this study was to determine the effect on the prevalence rate of depression and anxiety in a nursing home population of attributing somatic symptoms of depression and anxiety to either somatic or psychiatric disorder. Symptoms of major depression (MD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and panic disorder (PD) were measured using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN). Somatic symptoms of MD, GAD and PD were attributed to somatic causes when the interviewer was not sure about a psychiatric cause. To analyse the effect of this attribution on the prevalence rate of MD, GAD and PD, a sensitivity analysis was undertaken in which symptoms that were attributed to somatic causes were recoded as symptoms attributed to psychiatric disorder. Prevalence rates of MD, GAD and PD were calculated before and after recoding. The prevalence of MD after recoding rose from 7.5% to 8.1%. The prevalence of GAD did not change. The prevalence of PD rose from 1.5% to 1.8%. Attribution of somatic symptoms to either somatic or psychiatric disorder when the interviewer was not sure about a psychiatric cause of the somatic symptoms had only a very modest effect on the prevalence rate of major depression, generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder in a nursing home population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16389890      PMCID: PMC6878509          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  7 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity.

Authors:  L N Robins; J E Helzer; J Croughan; K S Ratcliff
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1981-04

3.  Reclassification of depression in the medically ill elderly.

Authors:  B S Fogel; M Fretwell
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Prevalence and risk indicators of depression in elderly nursing home patients: the AGED study.

Authors:  K Jongenelis; A M Pot; A M H Eisses; A T F Beekman; H Kluiter; M W Ribbe
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Does the ECA underestimate the prevalence of late-life depression?

Authors:  K Heithoff
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Psychometric assessment of depression in an elderly general medical population. Over- or underassessment?

Authors:  R G Harper; D Kotik-Harper; H Kirby
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.254

7.  Diagnosing major depression in the elderly: evidence for response bias in standardized diagnostic interviews?

Authors:  B Knäuper; H U Wittchen
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.791

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Clinical presentation of anxiety among patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  M López-Gómez; M Espinola; J Ramirez-Bermudez; I E Martinez-Juarez; A L Sosa
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.570

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.