Literature DB >> 16389467

Bond strength of resin composite to differently conditioned amalgam.

M Ozcan1, P K Vallittu, M-C Huysmans, W Kalk, T Vahlberg.   

Abstract

Bulk fracture of teeth, where a part of the amalgam restoration and/or the cusp is fractured, is a common clinical problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of a hybrid resin composite to fresh amalgam. Amalgams (N=84) were condensed into acrylic and randomly assigned to one of the following treatments (N=6): (1) Alloy primer + opaquer, (2) Air-particle abrasion (50 micro m Al(2)O(3)) + alloy primer + opaquer, (3) Silica coating (30 micro m SiO(x)) + silanization + opaquer, (4) Opaquer + pre-impregnated continuous bidirectional E-glass fibre sheets, (5) Silica coating + silanization + fibre sheets, (6) Silica coating + silanization + opaquer + fibre sheet application. Non-conditioned amalgam surfaces were considered as control group (7). The mean surface roughness depth (R(Z)) was measured from the control group and air-abraded amalgam surfaces. The resin composite was bonded to the conditioned amalgam specimens using polyethylene molds. All specimens were tested under dry and thermocycled (6.000, 5-55 degrees C, 30 s) conditions. The shear bond strength of resin composite to amalgam substrates was measured in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). Surface roughness values for the non-conditioned control group (R(Z) approximately 0.14 micro m) and for air-particle abraded surfaces with either Al(2)O(3) or SiO(x) (R(Z) approximately 0.19 micro m and R(Z) approximately 0.16 micro m, respectively) did not show significant differences (p=0.23) (One-way ANOVA). In dry conditions, silica coating and silanization followed by fibre sheet application exhibited significantly higher results (14.8+/-5.6 MPa) than those of the groups conditioned with alloy primer (2.2+/-0.7 MPa) (p<0.001), air-particle abrasion+alloy primer (4.4+/-2.0 MPa, p<0.001), silica coating+silanization alone (6.2+/-0.8 MPa, p=0.009) or non-conditioned group (1.4+/-0.6, p<0.001). Silica coating and silanization followed by additional fibre sheets with opaquer application (23.6+/-6.9 MPa) increased the bond strength significantly compared to those of other groups (group 5 vs group 6, p=0.007; other groups vs group 6, p<0.001). Thermocycling decreased the bond strengths significantly for all of the conditioning methods tested (for group 1, p<0.001; for group 2, p=0.013; for group 3, p=0.002; for group 4, p=0.026; for group 5, p=0.002; for group 6, p<0.001 and for group 7, p<0.001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16389467     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-6324-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  33 in total

1.  Bonding characteristics of a phosphonated anaerobic adhesive to amalgam.

Authors:  D C Watts; H Devlin; J E Fletcher
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Shear bond strength of a 4-META adhesive system.

Authors:  J Chang; W Scherer; A Tauk; R Martini
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Clinical studies concerning re-restoration of teeth.

Authors:  R J Elderton
Journal:  Adv Dent Res       Date:  1990-06

4.  The influence of an adhesive system on shear bond strength of repaired high-copper amalgams.

Authors:  F Hadavi; J H Hey; E R Ambrose; H E elBadrawy
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.440

5.  An in vitro comparison of four surface preparation techniques for veneering a compomer to stainless steel.

Authors:  F S Salama; B F el-Mallakh
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.874

6.  A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices.

Authors:  Willem M M Fennis; Ruud H Kuijs; Cees M Kreulen; F Joost M Roeters; Nico H J Creugers; Rob C W Burgersdijk
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Effect of air-powder abrasive instrument on restorative materials.

Authors:  R M Lubow; R L Cooley
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds?

Authors:  P J Plasmans; E A Reukers
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.440

9.  An in vivo study of cuspal fracture.

Authors:  W T Cavel; W P Kelsey; R J Blankenau
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Restoration fractures, cusp fractures and root fragments in a diverse sample of adults: 24-month incidence.

Authors:  M W Heft; G H Gilbert; T A Dolan; U Foerster
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.634

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of different surface treatment with panaviaV5 on shear bond strength of metal brackets to silver amalgam.

Authors:  Shiva Alavi; Farzaneh Shirani; Zahra Zarei; Seyed Amir Hossein Raji
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-02-23

2.  Effectiveness of different resin composite materials for repairing noncarious amalgam margin defects.

Authors:  Burak Gumustas; Soner Sismanoglu
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

3.  Micro-shear bond strength of universal adhesives used for amalgam repair with or without Alloy Primer.

Authors:  Hacer Balkaya; Sezer Demirbuga; Nazire Nurdan Çakir; Muhammed Karadas; Yahya Orcun Zorba
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 May-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.