Literature DB >> 16388460

The plant's capacity in regulating resource demand.

R Matyssek1, R Agerer, D Ernst, J-C Munch, W Osswald, H Pretzsch, E Priesack, H Schnyder, D Treutter.   

Abstract

Regulation of resource allocation in plants is the key to integrate understanding of metabolism and resource flux across the whole plant. The challenge is to understand trade-offs as plants balance allocation between different and conflicting demands, e.g., for staying competitive with neighbours and ensuring defence against parasites. Related hypothesis evaluation can, however, produce equivocal results. Overcoming deficits in understanding underlying mechanisms is achieved through integrated experimentation and modelling the various spatio-temporal scaling levels, from genetic control and cell metabolism towards resource flux at the stand level. An integrated, interdisciplinary research concept on herbaceous and woody plants and its outcome to date are used, while drawing attention to currently available knowledge. This assessment is based on resource allocation as driven through plant-pathogen and plant-mycorrhizosphere interaction, as well as competition with neighbouring plants in stands, conceiving such biotic interactions as a "unity" in the control of allocation. Biotic interaction may diminish or foster effects of abiotic stress on allocation, as changes in allocation do not necessarily result from metabolic re-adjustment but may obey allometric rules during ontogeny. Focus is required on host-pathogen interaction under variable resource supply and disturbance, including effects of competition and mycorrhization. Cost/benefit relationships in balancing resource investments versus gains turned out to be fundamental in quantifying competitiveness when related to the space, which is subject to competitive resource exploitation. A space-related view of defence as a form of prevention of decline in competitiveness may promote conversion of resource turnover across the different kinds of biotic interaction, given their capacity in jointly controlling whole plant resource allocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16388460     DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-872981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)        ISSN: 1435-8603            Impact factor:   3.081


  14 in total

1.  Uptake of non-pathogenic E. coli by Arabidopsis induces down-regulation of heat shock proteins.

Authors:  Chanyarat Paungfoo-Lonhienne; Susanne Schmidt; Thierry G A Lonhienne
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-12-01

2.  Is Pollen Production of Birch Controlled by Genetics and Local Conditions?

Authors:  Surendra Ranpal; Miriam Sieverts; Verena Wörl; Georgia Kahlenberg; Stefanie Gilles; Maria Landgraf; Kira Köpke; Franziska Kolek; Daria Luschkova; Tobias Heckmann; Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann; Carmen Büttner; Athanasios Damialis; Susanne Jochner-Oette
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Chemical defense, mycorrhizal colonization and growth responses in Plantago lanceolata L.

Authors:  Gerlinde Barbra De Deyn; A Biere; W H van der Putten; R Wagenaar; J N Klironomos
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Is polyphenol induction simply a result of altered carbon and nitrogen accumulation?

Authors:  Thomas M Arnold; Heidi M Appel; Jack C Schultz
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2012-09-07

5.  A dynamical model of environmental effects on allocation to carbon-based secondary compounds in juvenile trees.

Authors:  S Gayler; T E E Grams; W Heller; D Treutter; E Priesack
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Rice WRKY13 regulates cross talk between abiotic and biotic stress signaling pathways by selective binding to different cis-elements.

Authors:  Jun Xiao; Hongtao Cheng; Xianghua Li; Jinghua Xiao; Caiguo Xu; Shiping Wang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 7.  Development of disease-resistant rice using regulatory components of induced disease resistance.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takatsuji
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Seasonal Changes Affect Root Prunasin Concentration in Prunus serotina and Override Species Interactions between P. serotina and Quercus petraea.

Authors:  Piotr Robakowski; Ernest Bielinis; Jerzy Stachowiak; Iwona Mejza; Bartosz Bułaj
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Aboveground plant-to-plant communication reduces root nodule symbiosis and soil nutrient concentrations.

Authors:  Yuta Takahashi; Kaori Shiojiri; Akira Yamawo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Decomposers and root feeders interactively affect plant defence in Sinapis alba.

Authors:  Maité Lohmann; Stefan Scheu; Caroline Müller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.