Literature DB >> 16388167

Laparoscopic orchiopexy: is closure of the internal ring necessary?

Rakesh Handa1, R Kale, M M Harjai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Narrowing of the internal ring around the pulled through spermatic cord in cases of laparoscopic orchiopexy is the norm. AIM: To carry out a prospective study to see if closure of the internal ring is really necessary, hypothesis being that mobilization of the impalpable testis leaves a raw surface, which, coupled with the presence of the spermatic cord results in effective closure of the internal ring. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 51 patients with 65 impalpable testes underwent laparoscopic orchiopexy between July 1998 and June 2003. An impalpable testis was present in 21 cases on the left, 16 cases on the right and bilateral in 14 cases. Following complete mobilization required for orchiopexy, all testes with adequate length of spermatic cord were pulled down into the scrotum through the inguinal canal. No suture was applied to narrow the internal ring around the pulled through spermatic cord. Five testes were pulled down by an opening in the medial end of the inguinal canal due to inadequate length of the spermatic cord. In these cases the internal ring was closed by a suture.
RESULTS: Follow up of all cases ranged between 1.5 years to 6.5 years. Not a single case has reported with recurrence of a hernia.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that narrowing of the internal ring around the pulled through spermatic cord may not be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16388167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Postgrad Med        ISSN: 0022-3859            Impact factor:   1.476


  8 in total

1.  Orchidopexy without ligation of the processus vaginalis is not associated with an increased risk of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  S Ceccanti; A Zani; E Mele; D A Cozzi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Does the internal inguinal ring need closure during laparoscopic orchiopexy with Prentiss manoeuvre?

Authors:  Sarath Kumar Narayanan; Jagadeesh N Puthenvariath; Prathap Somnath; Arun Mohanan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Is ligation of hernial sac during orchiopexy mandatory?

Authors:  Veena Kumari; Nilay Biswas; Nilanjan Mitra; Hiralal Konar; Dipak Ghosh; Sukanta K Das
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-04

4.  Laparoscopic management of impalpable undescended testes: 20 years' experience.

Authors:  Vinay G Mehendale; Sharad N Shenoy; Rupin S Shah; Namita C Chaudhari; Alap V Mehendale
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  For Better Orchiopexy, Processus Vaginalis Should Be Dissected and a High Ligation Should Be Performed.

Authors:  Kaan Sonmez; Ramazan Karabulut; Zafer Turkyilmaz; Cem Kaya; Yildiz Pehlivan; A Can Basaklar
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2016-07-28

6.  Clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery for inguinal cryptorchidism.

Authors:  Yunjin Wang; Liu Chen; Xu Cui; Chaoming Zhou; Qing Zhou; Zhengmian Zhang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Laparoscopic repair of hernia in children: Comparison between ligation and nonligation of sac.

Authors:  Nitin Pant; Satish Kumar Aggarwal; Simmi K Ratan
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-04

8.  Testicular descent and fixation through a scrotal stria incision for the treatment of palpable cryptorchidism in children aged <3 years: 10-year experience with 1034 cases.

Authors:  Liu Chen; Wen-Hua Huang; Yun-Jin Wang; Qi-Liang Zhang; Chao-Ming Zhou; Xu Cui; Jian-Qin Zhang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.