Literature DB >> 16387889

Conditional coalescent trees with two mutation rates and their application to genomic instability.

Mathieu Emily1, Olivier François.   

Abstract

Humans have invested several genes in DNA repair and fidelity replication. To account for the disparity between the rarity of mutations in normal cells and the large number of mutations present in cancer, an hypothesis is that cancer cells must exhibit a mutator phenotype (genomic instability) during tumor progression, with the initiation of abnormal mutation rates caused by the loss of mismatch repair. In this study we introduce a stochastic model of mutation in tumor cells with the aim of estimating the amount of genomic instability due to the alteration of DNA repair genes. Our approach took into account the difficulties generated by sampling within tumoral clones and the fact that these clones must be difficult to isolate. We provide corrections to two classical statistics to obtain unbiased estimators of the raised mutation rate, and we show that large statistical errors may be associated with such estimators. The power of these new statistics to reject genomic instability is assessed and proved to increase with the intensity of mutation rates. In addition, we show that genomic instability cannot be detected unless the raised mutation rates exceed the normal rates by a factor of at least 1000.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16387889      PMCID: PMC1456266          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.044099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  34 in total

1.  Times on trees, and the age of an allele.

Authors:  M Stephens
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer.

Authors:  J Cairns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Genetic reconstruction of individual colorectal tumor histories.

Authors:  J L Tsao; Y Yatabe; R Salovaara; H J Järvinen; J P Mecklin; L A Aaltonen; S Tavaré; D Shibata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Cancer: the evolved consequence of a destabilized genome.

Authors:  G R Anderson; D L Stoler; B M Brenner
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 7.  A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C R Boland; S N Thibodeau; S R Hamilton; D Sidransky; J R Eshleman; R W Burt; S J Meltzer; M A Rodriguez-Bigas; R Fodde; G N Ranzani; S Srivastava
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Multiple mutations and cancer.

Authors:  Lawrence A Loeb; Keith R Loeb; Jon P Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mutator phenotypes in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  N P Bhattacharyya; A Skandalis; A Ganesh; J Groden; M Meuth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F S Leach; N C Nicolaides; N Papadopoulos; B Liu; J Jen; R Parsons; P Peltomäki; P Sistonen; L A Aaltonen; M Nyström-Lahti
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-12-17       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.