Literature DB >> 16387468

Mixed adherence to clinical practice guidelines for colorectal cancer in the Southern Netherlands in 2002.

V E P P Lemmens1, C D G W Verheij, M L G Janssen-Heijnen, H J T Rutten, J W W Coebergh.   

Abstract

AIMS: Population-based cancer registries can provide excellent data for insight in disease management practice. This study examines the extent to which the consensus-based national clinical guidelines (version 2000-2001) for colorectal cancer (CRC) had been implemented in the diagnostic and treatment approach in the Southern Netherlands in 2002.
METHODS: Data were gathered from the medical records for a random sample from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry of 308 patients with colorectal cancer. Adherence to clinical guidelines was determined for diagnostic assessment, pathology, and treatment during the first year after diagnosis.
RESULTS: Surgical procedures and referral for pre-operative radiotherapy were carried out largely conform the recommendations. The number of performed colonoscopies among colon cancer patients amounted to 60%; contrast enemas after incomplete colonoscopy were performed in only 27% of patients. The median number of examined lymph nodes was only six for patients with colon and five for patients with rectal cancer; the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer decreased from 95% of patients younger than 70 years to 48% of patients over 70.
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to clinical guidelines was not optimal. Feedback to surgeons and pathologists should improve adherence, especially with respect to nodal retrieval and assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16387468     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  6 in total

1.  Drug-eluting stents for all patients.

Authors:  A T L Ong; W J van der Giessen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  The impact of standard protocol implementation on the quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting.

Authors:  Peter Ihnát; Patricie Delongová; Jaroslav Horáček; Lucia Ihnát Rudinská; Petr Vávra; Pavel Zonča
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Factors predicting worse prognosis in patients affected by pT3 N0 colon cancer: long-term results of a monocentric series of 137 radically resected patients in a 5-year period.

Authors:  Roberto Biffi; Edoardo Botteri; Emilio Bertani; Maria Giulia Zampino; Sabina Cenciarelli; Fabrizio Luca; Simonetta Pozzi; Maria Laura Cossu; Antonio Chiappa; Nicole Rotmensz; Barbara Bazolli; Elena Magni; Angelica Sonzogni; Bruno Andreoni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer reduces lymph node harvest in proctectomy specimens.

Authors:  Sebastian G de la Fuente; Roberto J Manson; Kirk A Ludwig; Christopher R Mantyh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Patterns of colorectal cancer care in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand.

Authors:  Neetu Chawla; Eboneé N Butler; Jennifer Lund; Joan L Warren; Linda C Harlan; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

6.  Influence of age on variation in patterns of care in patients with rectal cancer in Catalonia (Spain).

Authors:  R Vernet; J M Borras; L Aliste; M Antonio; A Guarga; P Manchon-Walsh
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.405

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.