Literature DB >> 16387429

Pb speciation versus TCLP release in army firing range soils.

D Dermatas1, G Shen, M Chrysochoou, D G Grubb, N Menounou, P Dutko.   

Abstract

A series of soil parameter and mineralogical investigative techniques were applied to assess the Pb speciation in four US Army firing range soils that presented significantly different Pb leaching regimes and soil characteristics. Soil gradation tests were complemented by total chemical analyses, X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), Rietveld quantification, optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses. The bulk geotechnical, mineralogical and chemical analyses pointed to two possible Pb retention mechanisms: precipitation as lead carbonate and sorption in the case of fine-grained soils. Lead speciation and mobility was further investigated by the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) and sequential extraction test (SET). As the TCLP Pb concentrations did not necessarily reflect the total Pb analysis of the soils, the Pb leachability ratio (TCLP/total) was found to be controlled by soil mineralogy and its response to changes in system pH. Geochemical modeling, using Visual MINTEQ, was employed to evaluate the mechanisms that controlled the observed TCLP Pb leaching behavior. It was found that lead carbonate precipitation/dissolution reactions controlled Pb TCLP leachability in all soils, while sorptive phenomena did not seem to play a role even in the case of fine-grained soils. More specifically, TCLP Pb leachability was controlled by the pH, the available Pb and the available carbonate in solution. This indicates that geochemical modeling strongly complimented TCLP Pb analyses. Thus, geochemical modeling is an important assessment tool to evaluate the magnitude of site-specific Pb-related environmental problems in firing range soils. Carbonation reactions, involving metallic Pb, that occur during the SET obscure its ability to reliably ascertain Pb speciation. More specifically, SET lumps the extractable Pb into predetermined phase categories that may not be truly representative of the actual soil mineralogy or dominant forms of Pb in the soil. A thorough geotechnical, mineralogical and chemical investigation of firing range soils, complemented by geochemical modeling, was therefore found to be a more reliable approach to evaluate Pb speciation and TCLP release in firing range soils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16387429     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  6 in total

1.  Enrichment and solubility of trace metals associated with magnetic extracts in industrially derived contaminated soils.

Authors:  S G Lu; H Y Wang; Y Y Chen
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Effectiveness of chemical amendments for stabilisation of lead and antimony in risk-based land management of soils of shooting ranges.

Authors:  Peter Sanderson; Ravi Naidu; Nanthi Bolan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Lead particle size and its association with firing conditions and range maintenance: implications for treatment.

Authors:  Dimitris Dermatas; Maria Chrysochoou
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  The role of biochar, natural iron oxides, and nanomaterials as soil amendments for immobilizing metals in shooting range soil.

Authors:  Anushka Upamali Rajapaksha; Mahtab Ahmad; Meththika Vithanage; Kwon-Rae Kim; Jun Young Chang; Sang Soo Lee; Yong Sik Ok
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Assessing metal mobilization from industrial lead-contaminated soils in an urban site.

Authors:  Patricio X Pinto; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.524

6.  The impact of tree barriers on the dispersal of lead in the soil at highway roadsides.

Authors:  Pariente Sarah; Helena Zhevelev; Eyal Sachs; Anatoly G Fragin; Sarit Ohev-Zion
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.513

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.