Literature DB >> 16386925

Distraction from randomization in diagnostic research.

Cornelis J Biesheuvel1, Diederick E Grobbee, Karel G M Moons.   

Abstract

The ultimate goal of medical care, including diagnostic testing, is to improve patient outcome. Accordingly, it has been advocated widely that when establishing a test's diagnostic accuracy, the impact of the test on patient outcome subsequently must be quantified. When studying patient outcome in medical research, the use of randomized comparisons comes into perspective. In our view, randomized studies often are not necessary to validly estimate the effect of the diagnostic test on patient outcome. Results of cross-sectional diagnostic studies, combined with results from therapeutic studies, often will suffice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16386925     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  6 in total

1.  Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.

Authors:  Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Correlations between Phlegm Syndrome of Chinese Medicine and Coronary Angiography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qiu-Yan Zhang; Hao Liang; Hou-Wu Gong; Hui-Yong Huang; Xiao-Qing Zhou; Xiang Sun
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Joris A H de Groot; Anne W S Rutjes; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-02-09

4.  Impact of Modified Transesophageal Echocardiography on Mortality and Stroke after Cardiac Surgery: A Large Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wouter W Jansen Klomp; Carl G M Moons; Arno P Nierich; George J Brandon Bravo Bruinsma; Arnoud W J Van't Hof; Jan G Grandjean; Linda M Peelen
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2017-09-11

5.  Cardiovascular guidelines based on high-quality evidence: Are we getting there?

Authors:  Wouter B van Dijk; Diederick E Grobbee
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 7.804

6.  From accuracy to patient outcome and cost-effectiveness evaluations of diagnostic tests and biomarkers: an exemplary modelling study.

Authors:  Hendrik Koffijberg; Bas van Zaane; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.