OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of aortic valve replacement with the pulmonary autograft in patients with rheumatic heart disease. METHODS: From October 1993 through September 2003, 81 rheumatic patients with aortic valve disease, mean age 29.5+/-11.9 years (11-56 years) underwent, the Ross procedure with root replacement technique. Forty patients were 30 years of age or below (young rheumatics). Associated procedures included mitral valve repair (n=19), open mitral commissurotomy (n=15), tricuspid valve repair (n=2), and homograft mitral valve replacement (n=2). RESULTS: Early mortality was 7.4% (six patients). Mean follow-up was 92.3+/-40.9 months (7-132 months, median 109 months). Sixty of the 73 patients whose follow-up was available (82%) had no significant aortic regurgitation. Re-operation was required in seven (8.4%) patients for autograft dysfunction with failed mitral valve repair (n=3), autograft dysfunction alone (n=2) and failed mitral valve repair alone (n=2). No re-operations were required for the pulmonary homograft. There were six (7.5%) late deaths. Actuarial survival and re-operation-free survival at 109 months were 84.5+/-4.1% and 90.5+/-3.7%, respectively. Freedom from significant aortic stenosis or regurgitation was 78.4+/-5.2% and event-free survival was 64.6+/-5.8%. When compared to rheumatics above 30 years of age, the relative risk of autograft dysfunction was high in the young rheumatics. CONCLUSION: The Ross procedure is not suitable for young patients with rheumatic heart disease. However, it provides acceptable mid-term results in carefully selected older (>30 years) patients with isolated rheumatic aortic valve disease.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of aortic valve replacement with the pulmonary autograft in patients with rheumatic heart disease. METHODS: From October 1993 through September 2003, 81 rheumaticpatients with aortic valve disease, mean age 29.5+/-11.9 years (11-56 years) underwent, the Ross procedure with root replacement technique. Forty patients were 30 years of age or below (young rheumatics). Associated procedures included mitral valve repair (n=19), open mitral commissurotomy (n=15), tricuspid valve repair (n=2), and homograft mitral valve replacement (n=2). RESULTS: Early mortality was 7.4% (six patients). Mean follow-up was 92.3+/-40.9 months (7-132 months, median 109 months). Sixty of the 73 patients whose follow-up was available (82%) had no significant aortic regurgitation. Re-operation was required in seven (8.4%) patients for autograft dysfunction with failed mitral valve repair (n=3), autograft dysfunction alone (n=2) and failed mitral valve repair alone (n=2). No re-operations were required for the pulmonary homograft. There were six (7.5%) late deaths. Actuarial survival and re-operation-free survival at 109 months were 84.5+/-4.1% and 90.5+/-3.7%, respectively. Freedom from significant aortic stenosis or regurgitation was 78.4+/-5.2% and event-free survival was 64.6+/-5.8%. When compared to rheumatics above 30 years of age, the relative risk of autograft dysfunction was high in the young rheumatics. CONCLUSION: The Ross procedure is not suitable for young patients with rheumatic heart disease. However, it provides acceptable mid-term results in carefully selected older (>30 years) patients with isolated rheumatic aortic valve disease.