PURPOSE: IGF-I serum levels have been demonstrated as being associated with prostate cancer (PCa) and can serve as a predictive factor for the risk of PCa development. However, the role of IGF-II in PCa and its importance as a predictive marker is still unclear. Our aim was to determine PSA and IGF-II serum levels in patients with PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to analyse the value of IGF-II as an additional predictive factor in the diagnostics of PCa. METHODS: 112 patients who underwent surgery for BPH or PCa (no hormonal treatment, no further malignancies) were included in this study ((I) 38 PCa, PSA < or = 15 ng/ml; (II) 34 PCa, PSA > 15 ng/ml; (III) 40 BPH). Preoperative serum levels of total PSA and total IGF-II were determined by ELFA and ELISA, respectively. RESULTS: PSA levels were (I) 5.7+/-1.9 ng/ml; (II) 25.0+/-11.5 ng/ml and (III) 4.0+/-2.8 ng/ml. (II) was statistically associated with a high grading (2b/3; p = 0.0182), a high Gleason sum score (7-10; p = 0.0049) and a non-organ confined tumor (T3/4; p = 0.0009) compared to (I), all Chi2 test. IGF-II levels were significantly higher in PCa (I+II) compared to BPH (833.8+/-238.9 ng/ml vs. 633.3+/-141.4 ng/ml, p < 0.0001, t-test). Both PSA and IGF-II were associated with tumor staging (p = 0.0097, p = 0.0308; t-test). No significant correlation was observed between PSA and IGF-II levels. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the combination of PSA and IGF-II improves the prediction of tumor staging in PCa (p = 0.0175 and p = 0.0459, Wald test). Additionally, the combination of PSA and IGF-II can significantly increase discrimination between BPH and PCa; each p < 0.0001, Wald test. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that IGF-II serum levels may serve as an additional parameter for (a) improved determination of tumor staging and (b) better discrimination between BPH and PCa.
PURPOSE:IGF-I serum levels have been demonstrated as being associated with prostate cancer (PCa) and can serve as a predictive factor for the risk of PCa development. However, the role of IGF-II in PCa and its importance as a predictive marker is still unclear. Our aim was to determine PSA and IGF-II serum levels in patients with PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to analyse the value of IGF-II as an additional predictive factor in the diagnostics of PCa. METHODS: 112 patients who underwent surgery for BPH or PCa (no hormonal treatment, no further malignancies) were included in this study ((I) 38 PCa, PSA < or = 15 ng/ml; (II) 34 PCa, PSA > 15 ng/ml; (III) 40 BPH). Preoperative serum levels of total PSA and total IGF-II were determined by ELFA and ELISA, respectively. RESULTS:PSA levels were (I) 5.7+/-1.9 ng/ml; (II) 25.0+/-11.5 ng/ml and (III) 4.0+/-2.8 ng/ml. (II) was statistically associated with a high grading (2b/3; p = 0.0182), a high Gleason sum score (7-10; p = 0.0049) and a non-organ confined tumor (T3/4; p = 0.0009) compared to (I), all Chi2 test. IGF-II levels were significantly higher in PCa (I+II) compared to BPH (833.8+/-238.9 ng/ml vs. 633.3+/-141.4 ng/ml, p < 0.0001, t-test). Both PSA and IGF-II were associated with tumor staging (p = 0.0097, p = 0.0308; t-test). No significant correlation was observed between PSA and IGF-II levels. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the combination of PSA and IGF-II improves the prediction of tumor staging in PCa (p = 0.0175 and p = 0.0459, Wald test). Additionally, the combination of PSA and IGF-II can significantly increase discrimination between BPH and PCa; each p < 0.0001, Wald test. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that IGF-II serum levels may serve as an additional parameter for (a) improved determination of tumor staging and (b) better discrimination between BPH and PCa.
Authors: Harold D Love; S Erin Booton; Braden E Boone; Joan P Breyer; Tatsuki Koyama; Monica P Revelo; Scott B Shappell; Jeffrey R Smith; Simon W Hayward Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mari-Anne Rowlands; David Gunnell; Ross Harris; Lars J Vatten; Jeff M P Holly; Richard M Martin Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Sean Harrison; Rosie Lennon; Jeff Holly; Julian P T Higgins; Mike Gardner; Claire Perks; Tom Gaunt; Vanessa Tan; Cath Borwick; Pauline Emmet; Mona Jeffreys; Kate Northstone; Sabina Rinaldi; Stephen Thomas; Suzanne D Turner; Anna Pease; Vicky Vilenchick; Richard M Martin; Sarah J Lewis Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Djeda Belharazem; Matthias Kirchner; Franziska Geissler; Peter Bugert; Martin Spahn; Burkhard Kneitz; Hubertus Riedmiller; Christian Sauer; Stefan Küffer; Lutz Trojan; Christian Bolenz; Maurice Stephan Michel; Alexander Marx; Philipp Ströbel Journal: Endocr Connect Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 3.335