Literature DB >> 16386352

Reassessing the current TNM lymph node staging for renal cell carcinoma.

Carlo Terrone1, C Cracco, F Porpiglia, E Bollito, C Scoffone, M Poggio, A Berruti, F Ragni, M Cossu, R M Scarpa, S Rocca Rossetti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The most commonly used staging system for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system. In the most recent TNM edition, lymph node (LN) involvement is defined as pN0, pN1, or pN2, depending on the number of metastatic LNs (none, 1, or >1). This study evaluated the prognostic value of this classification and tried to improve its clinical impact by considering an additional parameter, that is, LN density (ratio between number of positive LNs and total number of LNs retrieved).
METHODS: All pathologic reports of radical nephrectomies performed for RCC in two urologic centers between November 1983 and December 1999 were reviewed. For each patient, complete clinical and pathologic data, number of LNs removed, location and number of positive LNs, and LN density were recorded. The Kaplan-Meyer method and the log-rank test were used to calculate cause-specific survival rates and to compare survival curves, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 735 patients underwent radical nephrectomy. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 618 cases, and the rate of positive LNs was 14.2%. The 5-yr cause-specific survival rate of pN+ patients was 18%, with no statistically significant difference between pN1 and pN2. The average number of LNs removed was 13 (range, 1-35). The median number of LNs involved was 3 (range, 1-18). LN density ranged between 3.7% and 100% (median, 22.9%). The number of LNs removed had no impact on survival in pN+ patients. The only significant unfavorable prognostic factors were >4 LNs involved (p = 0.02) and LN density >60% (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The results show that in RCC the current TNM stratification of positive LNs is not significantly correlated with prognosis. From our data it appears that classification as < or =4 or >4 LNs involved, supported by LN density, better reflects the impact of the disease on survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16386352     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  17 in total

Review 1.  The connectivity of lymphogenous and hematogenous tumor cell dissemination: biological insights and clinical implications.

Authors:  Jonathan P Sleeman; Blake Cady; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  [Renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  A Haferkamp; D Rohde; S C Müller; H Rübben; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  The lymph node pre-metastatic niche.

Authors:  Jonathan P Sleeman
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 4.  The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Glen W Barrisford; Boris Gershman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Volpe; Jean Jacques Patard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Validation of the 2009 TNM Classification for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparison with the 2002 TNM Classification by Concordance Index.

Authors:  Chunwoo Lee; Dalsan You; Junsoo Park; In Gab Jeong; Cheryn Song; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-08-22

7.  Should patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma have a lymph node dissection?

Authors:  Stephen H Culp; Christopher G Wood
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2009-02-10

Review 8.  The changing face of renal cell carcinoma pathology.

Authors:  Hakan Aydin; Ming Zhou
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  [Value of lymph node dissection for renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  I Matuschek; A S Merseburger; M A Kuczyk
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Staging of renal cell carcinoma: Current concepts.

Authors:  John S Lam; Tobias Klatte; Alberto Breda
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.