Literature DB >> 16386347

The lower limb flexion reflex in humans.

Giorgio Sandrini1, Mariano Serrao, Paolo Rossi, Antonietta Romaniello, Giorgio Cruccu, Jean Claude Willer.   

Abstract

The flexion or flexor reflex (FR) recorded in the lower limbs in humans (LLFR) is a widely investigated neurophysiological tool. It is a polysynaptic and multisegmental spinal response that produces a withdrawal of the stimulated limb and resembles (having several features in common) the hind-paw FR in animals. The FR, in both animals and humans, is mediated by a complex circuitry modulated at spinal and supraspinal level. At rest, the LLFR (usually obtained by stimulating the sural/tibial nerve and by recording from the biceps femoris/tibial anterior muscle) appears as a double burst composed of an early, inconstantly present component, called the RII reflex, and a late, larger and stable component, called the RIII reflex. Numerous studies have shown that the afferents mediating the RII reflex are conveyed by large-diameter, low-threshold, non-nociceptive A-beta fibers, and those mediating the RIII reflex by small-diameter, high-threshold nociceptive A-delta fibers. However, several afferents, including nociceptive and non-nociceptive fibers from skin and muscles, have been found to contribute to LLFR activation. Since the threshold of the RIII reflex has been shown to correspond to the pain threshold and the size of the reflex to be related to the level of pain perception, it has been suggested that the RIII reflex might constitute a useful tool to investigate pain processing at spinal and supraspinal level, pharmacological modulation and pathological pain conditions. As stated in EFNS guidelines, the RIII reflex is the most widely used of all the nociceptive reflexes, and appears to be the most reliable in the assessment of treatment efficacy. However, the RIII reflex use in the clinical evaluation of neuropathic pain is still limited. In addition to its nocifensive function, the LLFR seems to be linked to posture and locomotion. This may be explained by the fact that its neuronal circuitry, made up of a complex pool of interneurons, is interposed in motor control and, during movements, receives both peripheral afferents (flexion reflex afferents, FRAs) and descending commands, forming a multisensorial feedback mechanism and projecting the output to motoneurons. LLFR excitability, mediated by this complex circuitry, is finely modulated in a state- and phase-dependent manner, rather as we observe in the FR in animal models. Several studies have demonstrated that LLFR excitability may be influenced by numerous physiological conditions (menstrual cycle, stress, attention, sleep and so on) and pathological states (spinal lesions, spasticity, Wallenberg's syndrome, fibromyalgia, headaches and so on). Finally, the LLFR is modulated by several drugs and neurotransmitters. In summary, study of the LLFR in humans has proved to be an interesting functional window onto the spinal and supraspinal mechanisms of pain processing and onto the spinal neural control mechanisms operating during posture and locomotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16386347     DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neurobiol        ISSN: 0301-0082            Impact factor:   11.685


  102 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and electrical pain thresholds after single and repeated stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  José A Biurrun Manresa; Alban Y Neziri; Michele Curatolo; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Ole K Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Comparison of the electrically evoked leg withdrawal reflex in cerebellar patients and healthy controls.

Authors:  T F B Kolb; S Lachauer; B Schoch; M Gerwig; D Timmann; F P Kolb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The startle reaction to somatosensory inputs: different response pattern to stimuli of upper and lower limbs.

Authors:  Silvio Alvarez-Blanco; Lucia Leon; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Pain and inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt; Brian Davis; David G Binion
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.325

5.  Modification of spasticity by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ursula S Hofstoetter; William B McKay; Keith E Tansey; Winfried Mayr; Helmut Kern; Karen Minassian
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Shared bimanual tasks elicit bimanual reflexes during movement.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cerebral and spinal modulation of pain by emotions.

Authors:  Mathieu Roy; Mathieu Piché; Jen-I Chen; Isabelle Peretz; Pierre Rainville
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex.

Authors:  Davina Wildemeersch; Jens Gios; Philippe G Jorens; Guy H Hans
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Spinal and Cerebral Integration of Noxious Inputs in Left-handed Individuals.

Authors:  Stéphane Northon; Zoha Deldar; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Reliability of the nociceptive flexor reflex (RIII) threshold and association with Pain threshold.

Authors:  Peter S Micalos; Eric J Drinkwater; Jack Cannon; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Frank E Marino
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.