Literature DB >> 16386067

Development and application of clinical prediction rules to improve decision making in physical therapist practice.

John D Childs1, Joshua A Cleland.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16386067     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/86.1.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


× No keyword cloud information.
  22 in total

Review 1.  Clinical prediction rules for physical therapy interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-12-18

2.  Manual physical therapy in the Netherlands: reflecting on the past and planning for the future in an international perspective.

Authors:  Rob A B Oostendorp
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

3.  Potential pitfalls of clinical prediction rules.

Authors:  Chad E Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

4.  Prescriptive clinical prediction rules in back pain research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen May; Richard Rosedale
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

5.  Clinimetrics corner: choosing appropriate study designs for particular questions about treatment subgroups.

Authors:  Peter Kent; Mark Hancock; Ditte H D Petersen; Hanne L Mjøsund
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-09

6.  Studies of quality and impact in clinical diagnosis and decision-making.

Authors:  Eric J Hegedus
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-03

7.  Psychological factors are associated with return to pre-injury levels of sport and physical activity after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Shelby E Baez; Matthew C Hoch; Johanna M Hoch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from cervical traction and exercise.

Authors:  Nicole H Raney; Evan J Petersen; Tracy A Smith; James E Cowan; Daniel G Rendeiro; Gail D Deyle; John D Childs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Use of evidence-based practice among athletic training educators, clinicians, and students, part 2: attitudes, beliefs, accessibility, and barriers.

Authors:  Cailee W McCarty; Dorice A Hankemeier; Jessica M Walter; Eric J Newton; Bonnie L Van Lunen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Independent evaluation of a clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulative therapy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark J Hancock; Christopher G Maher; Jane Latimer; Robert D Herbert; James H McAuley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.