| Literature DB >> 16385904 |
Nam-Kyoo Lim1, Sang-Gue Park, Ed Stanek.
Abstract
In bioequivalence trials, one often considers two or more generic products with the original one. The 3 x 3 crossover design can be adopted to evaluate the two generic candidates with a brand name drug, rather than conducting two separate 2 x 2 crossover trials. Dropouts, however, are more likely to occur due to various administrative reasons when we consider a higher order crossover design. A modified method, which was originally given by Chow and Shao (1997), is extended to compare two generic products with a reference in the incomplete 3 x 3 crossover design. A simulation study and discussion are also presented.Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16385904 DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200410144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biom J ISSN: 0323-3847 Impact factor: 2.207