Literature DB >> 16385326

Gamma-knife radiosurgery for cranial base meningiomas: experience of tumor control, clinical course, and morbidity in a follow-up of more than 8 years.

Iris Zachenhofer1, Stefan Wolfsberger, Martin Aichholzer, Alexander Bertalanffy, Karl Roessler, Klaus Kitz, Engelbert Knosp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Surgical resection of cranial base meningiomas is often limited owing to involvement of crucial neural structures. Within the last 2 decades Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has gained increasing importance as an adjunct treatment after incomplete resection and as an alternative treatment to open surgery. However, reports of long-term results are still sparse. We therefore performed this study to analyze the long-term results of GKRS treatment of cranial base meningiomas, following our previously published early follow-up experience.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the medical files for Gamma Knife and surgical treatments, clinicoradiological findings, and outcome was carried out focusing on tumor control, clinical course, and morbidity.
RESULTS: Between 1992 and 1995, we treated 36 patients with cranial base meningiomas using GKRS (male:female ratio, 1:5; mean age, 59 yr; range, 44-89 yr). Twenty-five patients were treated with GKRS after open surgery, and 11 patients received GKRS alone. Tumor control, neurological outcomes, and adverse effects were analyzed after a long-term follow-up period (mean, 103 mo; range, 70-133 mo) and compared with our previous results after an early follow-up period (mean, 48 mo; range, 36-76 mo). Control of tumor growth was achieved in 94% of patients. Compared with the early follow-up period, the late neuroradiological effects of GKRS on cranial base meningiomas were continuing tumor shrinkage in 11 patients (33%), stable tumor size in 20 patients (64%) and tumor progression in two meningiomas (6%). The neurological status improved in 16 patients (44%), remained stable in 19 patients (52%), and deteriorated in one patient (4%). Adverse side effects of GKRS were found only during the early follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that GKRS is not only a safe and effective treatment modality for cranial base meningiomas in short-term observation, but also in a mean long-term follow-up period of more than 8 years. Tumor shrinkage and clinical improvement also continued during the longer follow-up period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16385326     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000190654.82265.a3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  25 in total

Review 1.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for benign meningiomas.

Authors:  Orin Bloch; Gurvinder Kaur; Brian J Jian; Andrew T Parsa; Igor J Barani
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  New prospects for management and treatment of inoperable and recurrent skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  Mahlon D Johnson; Burak Sade; Michael T Milano; Joung H Lee; Steven A Toms
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Radiation techniques in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Deepak Khuntia; Wolfgang A Tomé; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 4.  Contemporary surgical outcome for skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  Chien-Min Chen; Abel Po-Hao Huang; Lu-Ting Kuo; Yong-Kwang Tu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review.

Authors:  Leland Rogers; Igor Barani; Marc Chamberlain; Thomas J Kaley; Michael McDermott; Jeffrey Raizer; David Schiff; Damien C Weber; Patrick Y Wen; Michael A Vogelbaum
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Partial skull base tumour resection in combination with radiosurgery: an escape procedure or a reasonable solution of treatment?

Authors:  Gorazd Bunc; Janez Ravnik; Maja Ravnik; Tomaz Velnar
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Value of K i -67 Labeling Index in Predicting Recurrence of WHO Grade I Cranial Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Jose Gabrielle Matias; Ignacio Jusue-Torres; Brendan Martin; Ankush Bajaj; Ewa Borys; Edward Melian; Kevin Barton; Douglas E Anderson; Vikram C Prabhu
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-09-06

8.  Gamma Knife radiosurgery for meningiomas arising from the tentorium: a 22-year experience.

Authors:  Seong-Hyun Park; Hideyuki Kano; Ajay Niranjan; Edward Monaco; John C Flickinger; L Dade Lunsford
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Individualized Surgical Approach Planning for Petroclival Tumors Using a 3D Printer.

Authors:  Thomas John Muelleman; Jeremy Peterson; Naweed Iffat Chowdhury; Jason Gorup; Paul Camarata; James Lin
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 10.  FACT-MNG: tumor site specific web-based outcome instrument for meningioma patients.

Authors:  D Zlotnick; S N Kalkanis; A Quinones-Hinojosa; K Chung; M E Linskey; R L Jensen; F DeMonte; F G Barker; C A Racine; M S Berger; P M Black; M Cusimano; L N Sekhar; A Parsa; M Aghi; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.