Literature DB >> 1638531

Effect of bivalent interaction upon apparent antibody affinity: experimental confirmation of theory using fluorescence photobleaching and implications for antibody binding assays.

E N Kaufman1, R K Jain.   

Abstract

The affinity of a monoclonal antibody for its tumor-associated antigen is one of several parameters governing in vivo monoclonal antibody distribution. However, there is a lack of apparent correlation between the affinity of a bivalent monoclonal antibody measured using equilibrium binding experiments and its in vivo delivery. Furthermore, differences in the reported affinity for identical antibody/antigen pairs are quite common in the literature. In this paper, both of these discrepancies are addressed in terms of variation in avidity due to bivalent interaction. The enhancement of avidity afforded by bivalent attachment is addressed theoretically by extending the model of Crothers and Metzger (Immunochemistry, 9: 341-357, 1972). Theoretical assessment of Lineweaver-Burk, Scatchard, Steward-Petty, Langmuir, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, and Sips models demonstrates quantitatively that the measured affinity using equilibrium binding experiments may vary over four orders of magnitude with similar variation in experimental cellular antigen density. Further, the measured affinity is a function of the experimental protocol. Predictions of avidity enhancement were confirmed experimentally using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. These experiments measured the equilibrium binding constant and concentration of binding sites for an immunoglobulin G monoclonal antibody and its F(ab) fragment directed against the rabbit VX2 carcinoma cell line. Bivalent binding data agree quantitatively with those predicted by the bivalent model with no adjustable parameters. It is concluded that bivalent equilibrium binding constants are useful only in antibody screening, where experimental conditions are identical for all series. They must be used with caution in predicting in vivo antibody distribution, and it is recommended that the intrinsic, monovalent affinity be measured in tandem with any bivalent antibody study as a standard reference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1638531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  39 in total

1.  Following single antibody binding to purple membranes in real time.

Authors:  Ferry Kienberger; Harald Mueller; Vassili Pastushenko; Peter Hinterdorfer
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Integrated mimicry of B cell antibody mutagenesis using yeast homologous recombination.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Swers; Yik A Yeung; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 3.  Ligand-targeted delivery of therapeutic siRNA.

Authors:  Yutaka Ikeda; Kazunari Taira
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Simplified models for heterobivalent ligand binding: when are they applicable and which are the factors that affect their target residence time.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 5.  FRAP in pharmaceutical research: practical guidelines and applications in drug delivery.

Authors:  Hendrik Deschout; Koen Raemdonck; Jo Demeester; Stefaan C De Smedt; Kevin Braeckmans
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Direct in vivo measurement of targeted binding in a human tumor xenograft.

Authors:  D A Berk; F Yuan; M Leunig; R K Jain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Small heat shock protein speciation: novel non-canonical 44 kDa HspB5-related protein species in rat and human tissues.

Authors:  Rainer Benndorf; Robert R Gilmont; Sahoko Hirano; Richard F Ransom; Peter R Jungblut; Martin Bommer; James E Goldman; Michael J Welsh
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 8.  1995 Whitaker Lecture: delivery of molecules, particles, and cells to solid tumors.

Authors:  R K Jain
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Transscleral diffusion of ethacrynic acid and sodium fluorescein.

Authors:  Cheng-Wen Lin; Yong Wang; Pratap Challa; David L Epstein; Fan Yuan
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  Characterisation of a panel of anti-tetanus toxin single-chain Fvs reveals cooperative binding.

Authors:  Nathan Scott; Omar Qazi; Michael J Wright; Neil F Fairweather; Mahendra P Deonarain
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.