BACKGROUND: Bioavailable testosterone (BT), circulating testosterone not bound to sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), is thought to easily penetrate cells. We compared BT measurements obtained by assays with those obtained by calculation with different testosterone association constants. METHODS: We obtained sera from 2 groups of hypogonadal men [group 1 (G1), 1421 samples; group 2 (G2), 170 samples] and a group of healthy men [group 3 (G3), 109 samples]. We added minute doses of [3H]testosterone to the sera, precipitated the SHBG-bound fraction of testosterone with ammonium sulfate (50% saturation), and then assayed serum BT (ABT) as %BT x total. Calculated BT (CBT) was determined with theoretical association constants of testosterone for SHBG (Ks = 1 x 10(9) L/mol) and albumin (Ka = 3.6 x 10(4) L/mol) and paired optimal Ks and Ka values obtained by use of Microsoft Excel software. RESULTS: CBT calculated with theoretical constants differed from ABT by >30% in 85.7% (G1), 84.1% (G2), and 77.9% (G3) of samples, and the mean CBT/ABT ratios were 1.57 (G1), 1.85 (G2), and 1.50 (G3) in spite of fairly good correlations. CBT calculated with paired optimal K(s) and K(a) differed from ABT by <30% in 87.4% (G1), 87.5% (G2), and 97.5% (G3) of samples, and mean CBT/ABT ratios were 0.95-1.04. CONCLUSIONS: To obtain CBT values as close as possible to ABT, optimal paired association constants determined for each studied population must be used instead of the theoretical association constants. Considering the uncertainty of calculating BT, however, use of the ammonium sulfate precipitation method for determining BT is advisable.
BACKGROUND: Bioavailable testosterone (BT), circulating testosterone not bound to sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), is thought to easily penetrate cells. We compared BT measurements obtained by assays with those obtained by calculation with different testosterone association constants. METHODS: We obtained sera from 2 groups of hypogonadal men [group 1 (G1), 1421 samples; group 2 (G2), 170 samples] and a group of healthy men [group 3 (G3), 109 samples]. We added minute doses of [3H]testosterone to the sera, precipitated the SHBG-bound fraction of testosterone with ammonium sulfate (50% saturation), and then assayed serum BT (ABT) as %BT x total. Calculated BT (CBT) was determined with theoretical association constants of testosterone for SHBG (Ks = 1 x 10(9) L/mol) and albumin (Ka = 3.6 x 10(4) L/mol) and paired optimal Ks and Ka values obtained by use of Microsoft Excel software. RESULTS:CBT calculated with theoretical constants differed from ABT by >30% in 85.7% (G1), 84.1% (G2), and 77.9% (G3) of samples, and the mean CBT/ABT ratios were 1.57 (G1), 1.85 (G2), and 1.50 (G3) in spite of fairly good correlations. CBT calculated with paired optimal K(s) and K(a) differed from ABT by <30% in 87.4% (G1), 87.5% (G2), and 97.5% (G3) of samples, and mean CBT/ABT ratios were 0.95-1.04. CONCLUSIONS: To obtain CBT values as close as possible to ABT, optimal paired association constants determined for each studied population must be used instead of the theoretical association constants. Considering the uncertainty of calculating BT, however, use of the ammonium sulfate precipitation method for determining BT is advisable.
Authors: Elisa Fabbri; Yang An; Marta Gonzalez-Freire; Marco Zoli; Marcello Maggio; Stephanie A Studenski; Josephine M Egan; Chee W Chia; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Andrea Salonia; Giulia Rastrelli; Geoffrey Hackett; Stephanie B Seminara; Ilpo T Huhtaniemi; Rodolfo A Rey; Wayne J G Hellstrom; Mark R Palmert; Giovanni Corona; Gert R Dohle; Mohit Khera; Yee-Ming Chan; Mario Maggi Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Peggy M Cawthon; John T Schousboe; Stephanie L Harrison; Kristine E Ensrud; Dennis Black; Jane A Cauley; Steven R Cummings; Erin S LeBlanc; Gail A Laughlin; Carrie M Nielson; Augusta Broughton; Deborah M Kado; Andrew R Hoffman; Sophie A Jamal; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Eric S Orwoll Journal: Bone Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Liesbeth Vandenput; Dan Mellström; Gail A Laughlin; Peggy M Cawthon; Jane A Cauley; Andrew R Hoffman; Magnus K Karlsson; Björn E Rosengren; Östen Ljunggren; Maria Nethander; Anna L Eriksson; Mattias Lorentzon; Jason Leung; Timothy Kwok; Eric S Orwoll; Claes Ohlsson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Peter Celec; Denisa Tretinárová; Gabriel Minárik; Andrej Ficek; Tomáš Szemes; Silvia Lakatošová; Eva Schmidtová; Ján Turňa; Ľudevít Kádaši; Daniela Ostatníková Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anna L Goldman; Shalender Bhasin; Frederick C W Wu; Meenakshi Krishna; Alvin M Matsumoto; Ravi Jasuja Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 25.261