BACKGROUND: Elevated pulse pressure (PP) is an indicator of poor outcome in hypertensives in the general population and on haemodialysis. The prognostic value of PP in pre-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4/5 and its interaction with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective study of 349 patients from the pre-dialysis clinic analysed the effect association of PP and RAS inhibition on adverse outcomes in CKD stages 4/5. Primary endpoints were a composite of death or dialysis. RESULTS: At baseline, 349 patients (63% males, 34% diabetics) were aged 60+/-0.8 years (mean+/-SEM) with systolic blood pressure (SBP) 149+/-1.3 mmHg, diastolic BP (DBP) 83+/-0.7 mmHg, PP 66+/- 1.0 mmHg, creatinine 442+/-16 micromol/l and haemoglobin 10.7+/-0.1 g/dl. Patients were followed up for 297+/-19 days and 93% took one to seven (2.45+/-0.07) antihypertensives. At presentation, the adverse outcome group had higher SBP (151+/-1.5 vs 145+/-2.4 mmHg; P<0.05), proportion of diabetes (39% vs 23%; P<0.05) and creatinine (478+/-22 vs 354+/-11 micromol/l; P<0.05), but lower haemoglobin (10.6+/-0.1 vs 11.2+/-0.2 g/dl; P<0.05). PP increased with age (r(2): 0.4; P<0.0001). PP >80 mmHg was associated with adverse outcome (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test P<0.05). In a model of proportional hazards regression, adjusted for age, baseline creatinine, diabetes and haemoglobin, elevated PP was associated with poorer outcome (hazards ratio: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.18; P<0.05) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin-receptor blocker use was beneficial (hazards ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.53-0.99; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that elevated PP indicates high risk of death or dialysis and the benefit of blockade of the RAS is independent of the baseline PP in patients with CKD stages 4/5.
BACKGROUND: Elevated pulse pressure (PP) is an indicator of poor outcome in hypertensives in the general population and on haemodialysis. The prognostic value of PP in pre-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4/5 and its interaction with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective study of 349 patients from the pre-dialysis clinic analysed the effect association of PP and RAS inhibition on adverse outcomes in CKD stages 4/5. Primary endpoints were a composite of death or dialysis. RESULTS: At baseline, 349 patients (63% males, 34% diabetics) were aged 60+/-0.8 years (mean+/-SEM) with systolic blood pressure (SBP) 149+/-1.3 mmHg, diastolic BP (DBP) 83+/-0.7 mmHg, PP 66+/- 1.0 mmHg, creatinine 442+/-16 micromol/l and haemoglobin 10.7+/-0.1 g/dl. Patients were followed up for 297+/-19 days and 93% took one to seven (2.45+/-0.07) antihypertensives. At presentation, the adverse outcome group had higher SBP (151+/-1.5 vs 145+/-2.4 mmHg; P<0.05), proportion of diabetes (39% vs 23%; P<0.05) and creatinine (478+/-22 vs 354+/-11 micromol/l; P<0.05), but lower haemoglobin (10.6+/-0.1 vs 11.2+/-0.2 g/dl; P<0.05). PP increased with age (r(2): 0.4; P<0.0001). PP >80 mmHg was associated with adverse outcome (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test P<0.05). In a model of proportional hazards regression, adjusted for age, baseline creatinine, diabetes and haemoglobin, elevated PP was associated with poorer outcome (hazards ratio: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.18; P<0.05) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin-receptor blocker use was beneficial (hazards ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.53-0.99; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that elevated PP indicates high risk of death or dialysis and the benefit of blockade of the RAS is independent of the baseline PP in patients with CKD stages 4/5.
Authors: Carmen A Peralta; David R Jacobs; Ronit Katz; Joachim H Ix; Magdalena Madero; Daniel A Duprez; Mark J Sarnak; Michael H Criqui; Holly J Kramer; Walter Palmas; David Herrington; Michael G Shlipak Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Shyamal Palit; Michel Chonchol; Alfred K Cheung; James Kaufman; Gerard Smits; Jessica Kendrick Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: K P Ng; W E Moody; C D Chue; N C Edwards; T Savage; C R V Tomson; R P Steeds; J N Townend; C J Ferro Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Raymond R Townsend; Julio A Chirinos; Afshin Parsa; Matthew A Weir; Stephen M Sozio; James P Lash; Jing Chen; Susan P Steigerwalt; Alan S Go; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Mohammed Rafey; Jackson T Wright; Mark J Duckworth; Crystal A Gadegbeku; Marshall P Joffe Journal: Hypertension Date: 2010-07-26 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Debasish Banerjee; Gabriel Contreras; Isabel Jaraba; Decio Carvalho; Luis Ortega; Cristiane Carvalho; Candido Pezon; Stephen P Rosenthal; Norman De La Rosa; Nuripama Vemuri; Gautam Cherla; Nilay Nahar Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Debasish Banerjee; Jacob Plange-Rhule; Nihil Chitalia; Kwabena Kumi; Frank B Micah; Francesco P Cappuccio; John B Eastwood Journal: Int J Hypertens Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 2.420
Authors: D Banerjee; P Winocour; T A Chowdhury; P De; M Wahba; R Montero; D Fogarty; A H Frankel; J Karalliedde; P B Mark; D C Patel; A Pokrajac; A Sharif; S Zac-Varghese; S Bain; I Dasgupta Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 2.388