Literature DB >> 16382964

Avian toxicity reference values for perfluorooctane sulfonate.

John L Newsted1, Paul D Jones, Katie Coady, John P Giesy.   

Abstract

Toxicity reference values (TRVs) and predicted no effect concentrations (PNECs) were derived for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) based on the characteristics of a top avian predator. On the basis of the protective assumptions used in this assessment, the benchmarks are protective of avian populations and were based on acute and chronic dietary exposures of northern bobwhite quail and mallard. Toxicological endpoints included mortality, growth, feed consumption, and histopathology. Reproductive endpoints included egg production, fertility, hatchability and survival, and growth of offspring. On the basis of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes Initiative methodology, and a lowest observable adverse effect concentration (LOAEC) of 10 mg PFOS kg(-1) feed, an uncertainty factor of 36 was derived. The TRV based on PFOS dietary intake was 0.021 mg PFOS kg(-1) body weight day(-1), while for serum, liver, and egg, TRVs were 1.7 microg PFOS mL(-1), 0.6 microg PFOS g(-1) wet weight, and 1.7 microg PFOS mL(-1), respectively. On the basis of the European Commission methodology, a correction factor of 2 (for lowest observed effect level to no observable effect level) and an assessment factor of 30, for a total adjustment of 60, were used to derive PNECs. PNECs based on dietary, mean serum, liver, and egg PFOS concentrations were 0.013 mg PFOS kg(-1) body weight day(-1), 1.0 microg PFOS mL(-1), 0.35 microg PFOS g(-1) wet weight, and 1.0 microg PFOS mL(-1), respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16382964     DOI: 10.1021/es050989v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Occurrence of pharmaceuticals, hormones, and perfluorinated compounds in groundwater in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yen-Ching Lin; Webber Wei-Po Lai; Hsin-hsin Tung; Angela Yu-Chen Lin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in two different populations of northern cardinals.

Authors:  Marie C Russell; Seth R Newton; Katherine M McClure; Rebecca S Levine; Lara P Phelps; Andrew B Lindstrom; Mark J Strynar
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Revaluation of stockpile amount of PFOS-containing aqueous film-forming foam in Japan: gaps and pitfalls in the stockpile survey.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Zushi; Atsushi Yamamoto; Kiyotaka Tsunemi; Shigeki Masunaga
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Legacy and Novel Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Juvenile Seabirds from the U.S. Atlantic Coast.

Authors:  Anna R Robuck; Mark G Cantwell; James P McCord; Lindsay M Addison; Marisa Pfohl; Mark J Strynar; Richard McKinney; David R Katz; David N Wiley; Rainer Lohmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Perfluoroalkyl Acid Binding with Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors α, γ, and δ, and Fatty Acid Binding Proteins by Equilibrium Dialysis with a Comparison of Methods.

Authors:  Manoochehr Khazaee; Emerson Christie; Weixiao Cheng; Mandy Michalsen; Jennifer Field; Carla Ng
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-02-26

6.  Footprints of Urban Micro-Pollution in Protected Areas: Investigating the Longitudinal Distribution of Perfluoroalkyl Acids in Wildlife Preserves.

Authors:  Ignacio A Rodriguez-Jorquera; Cecilia Silva-Sanchez; Mark Strynar; Nancy D Denslow; Gurpal S Toor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.