Literature DB >> 16382330

Early postnatal care among healthy newborns in 19 States: pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, 2000.

Amy Lansky1, Wanda D Barfield, Kristen S Marchi, Susan A Egerter, Alison A Galbraith, Paula A Braveman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine early postnatal care among healthy newborns during 2000 in 19 states.
METHODS: Using data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a multistate population-based postpartum survey of women, we calculated prevalences of early discharge (ED; stays of < or =2 days after vaginal delivery and < or =4 days after Cesarean delivery) and early follow-up (within 1 week) after ED. We used logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) describing how ED and lack of early follow-up were associated with state legislation and maternal characteristics.
RESULTS: While most healthy term newborns (83.5-93.4%) were discharged early, and most early-discharged newborns (51.5-88.5%) received recommended early follow-up, substantial proportions of early-discharged newborns did not. Compared with newborns in states where legislation covered both length of hospital stay (LOS) and follow-up, newborns in states without such legislation were more likely to have ED (aOR: 1.25; CI: 1.01-1.56). Lack of early follow-up was more likely among newborns in states with neither LOS nor follow-up legislation (aOR: 2.70, CI: 2.32-3.14), and only LOS legislation (aOR: 1.38, CI: 1.22-1.56) compared with those in states with legislation for both. ED was more likely among newborns born to multiparous women and those delivered by Cesarean section and less likely among those born to black and Hispanic mothers and mothers with less education.
CONCLUSIONS: Lack of early follow-up among ED newborns remains a problem, particularly in states without relevant legislation. These findings indicate the need for continued monitoring and for programmatic and policy strategies to improve receipt of recommended care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16382330     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-005-0050-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  22 in total

1.  Early discharge from the newborn nursery-effect on scheduling of follow-up visits by pediatricians.

Authors:  M J Maisels; E Kring
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates.

Authors:  Holly B Shulman; Brenda Colley Gilbert; Coi Gl Msphbrenda; Amy Lansky
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  The politics of "Drive-through deliveries": putting early postpartum discharge on the legislative agenda.

Authors:  E Declercq; D Simmes
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Prevalence of selected maternal behaviors and experiences, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 1999.

Authors:  Laurie F Beck; Brian Morrow; Leslie E Lipscomb; Christopher H Johnson; Mary E Gaffield; Mary Rogers; Brenda Colley Gilbert
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2002-04-26

Review 5.  Problems associated with early discharge of newborn infants. Early discharge of newborns and mothers: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  P Braveman; S Egerter; M Pearl; K Marchi; C Miller
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Hospital stay for healthy term newborns. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states.

Authors:  B C Gilbert; H B Shulman; L A Fischer; M M Rogers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-12

8.  The role of state maternal and child health programs in the issue of newborn discharge.

Authors:  L H Margolis; K Gay; A D Humphrey
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-03

Review 9.  Early postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants.

Authors:  S Brown; R Small; B Faber; A Krastev; P Davis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

10.  Newborn early discharge revisited: are California newborns receiving recommended postnatal services?

Authors:  Alison A Galbraith; Susan A Egerter; Kristen S Marchi; Gilberto Chavez; Paula A Braveman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  6 in total

1.  Care Coordination Associated with Improved Timing of Newborn Primary Care Visits.

Authors:  Neera K Goyal; Eric S Hall; Robert S Kahn; Scott L Wexelblatt; James M Greenberg; Zeina M Samaan; Courtney M Brown
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-09

Review 2.  The evolving role of leadership and change in maternal and child health epidemiology.

Authors:  Michael D Kogan; Wanda Barfield; Charlan Kroelinger
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-02

3.  Early postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants.

Authors:  Eleanor Jones; Fiona Stewart; Beck Taylor; Peter G Davis; Stephanie J Brown
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-08

4.  Individualized follow up programme and early discharge in term neonates.

Authors:  Maria Pia De Carolis; Carmen Cocca; Elisabetta Valente; Serafina Lacerenza; Serena Antonia Rubortone; Antonio Alberto Zuppa; Costantino Romagnoli
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.638

5.  Determinants of Length of Stay After Vaginal Deliveries in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.

Authors:  L Cegolon; G Maso; W C Heymann; M Bortolotto; A Cegolon; G Mastrangelo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Determinants of length of stay after cesarean sections in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.

Authors:  L Cegolon; G Mastrangelo; G Maso; G Dal Pozzo; W C Heymann; L Ronfani; F Barbone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.