Literature DB >> 16382311

Gregarious behaviour of evasive prey.

Ilan Eshel1, Emilia Sansone, Avner Shaked.   

Abstract

Gregarious behavior of potential prey was explained by Hamilton (1971) on the basis of risk-sharing: The probability of being picked up by a predator is small when one makes part of a large aggregate of prey. This argument holds only if the predator chooses its victims at random. It is not the case for herds of evasive prey in the open, where prey's gregarious behavior, favorable for the fast group members, makes it easier for the predator to home in on the slowest ones. We show conditions under which gregarious behavior of the relatively fast prey individuals leaves slowest prey with no other choice but to join the group. Failing to do so would signal their vulnerability, making them a preferred target for the predator. Analysis of an n + 1 player game of a predator and n unequal prey individuals clarifies conditions for fully gregarious, partially gregarious, or solitary behavior of the prey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16382311     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-005-0364-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.164


  6 in total

1.  Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon.

Authors:  Thomas J Valone; Jennifer J Templeton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Geometry for mutualistic and selfish herds: the limited domain of danger.

Authors:  R James; P G Bennett; J Krause
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 3.  Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence.

Authors:  M A Elgar
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1989-02

4.  Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance.

Authors:  P A Bednekoff; S L Lima
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle).

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1977-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Neurotoxic action of methyltetrahydrofolate in rat cerebellum unrelated to direct activation of kainate receptors.

Authors:  P J Roberts; G A Foster; E M Thomas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-10-22       Impact factor: 49.962

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.