Literature DB >> 16382296

The sulfonylurea glipizide does not inhibit ischemic preconditioning in anesthetized rabbits.

David M Flynn1, Andrew H Smith, Judith L Treadway, Carolyn B Levy, Walter C Soeller, Wayne A Boettner, Peter Wisniecki, David R Plowchalk, Steve S Gernhardt, W Ross Tracey, Delvin R Knight.   

Abstract

The K(ATP) channel blocker glibenclamide inhibits cardioprotection afforded by ischemic preconditioning (IPC), raising concern about sulfonylurea use by patients with cardiovascular disease. We examined the effects of the widely prescribed sulfonylurea glipizide (Glucotrol XL(R) ) on IPC in anesthetized rabbits. Initially, in parallel studies in pentobarbital-anesthetized rabbits, we identified doses of glipizide (GLIP, 0.17 mg/kg + 0.12 mg/kg/h, IV) and glibenclamide (GLIB, 0.05 mg/kg + 0.03 mg/kg/h, IV) that produced steady-state, clinically relevant plasma levels of both drugs; these doses also significantly increased plasma insulin by 51 +/- 17% (GLIP) and by 57 +/- 17% (GLIB, both p < 0.05 vs. their respective baseline levels). Subsequent parallel studies in ketamine-xylazine-anesthetized rabbits examined the effects of these doses of GLIP and GLIB on IPC. Myocardial injury (30 min coronary occlusion/120 min reperfusion), either with or without IPC (5 min occlusion/10 min reperfusion) was induced midway during a 2 h infusion of vehicle (VEH), GLIP or GLIB (n = 10-11 each). Infarct area (IA) normalized to area-at-risk (%IA/AAR) was 62 +/- 3% in the VEH group, and was significantly reduced to 39 +/- 5% by IPC (p < 0.05 vs. VEH). Neither GLIP nor GLIB treatment had any effect on %IA/AAR in the absence of IPC (p > 0.05). IPC-induced cardioprotection was preserved in the GLIP + IPC treatment group (45 +/- 4%) when compared to VEH alone (p < 0.05), but was attenuated in the presence of GLIB (GLIB+IPC: 53 +/- 4% IA/AAR, p > 0.05 vs. VEH). Thus, at a clinically relevant plasma concentration, glipizide did not limit the cardioprotective effects of IPC, and is unlikely to increase the severity of cardiac ischemic injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16382296     DOI: 10.1007/s10557-005-4970-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther        ISSN: 0920-3206            Impact factor:   3.727


  5 in total

Review 1.  Potential of glucose-lowering drugs to reduce cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Stuart W Zarich
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Pro- and Antiarrhythmic Actions of Sulfonylureas: Mechanistic and Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Charles E Leonard; Sean Hennessy; Xu Han; David S Siscovick; James H Flory; Rajat Deo
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 3.  Cardiovascular effects of anti-diabetes drugs.

Authors:  Lisa M Younk; Elizabeth M Lamos; Stephen N Davis
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.250

4.  Risk of sudden cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmia with sulfonylureas: An experience with conceptual replication in two independent populations.

Authors:  Neil Dhopeshwarkar; Colleen M Brensinger; Warren B Bilker; Samantha E Soprano; James H Flory; Ghadeer K Dawwas; Joshua J Gagne; Sean Hennessy; Charles E Leonard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Preconditioning the diabetic human myocardium.

Authors:  Vivek Sivaraman; Derek J Hausenloy; Abigail M Wynne; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 5.310

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.