Literature DB >> 16381203

Cervical disc arthroplasty: a controlled randomized prospective study with intermediate follow-up results. Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2005.

Robert J Hacker1.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors of studies of anterior cervical fusion for disc-related disease have documented satisfying clinical results and infrequent complications. Recently, cervical disc arthroplasty has entered clinical trials as an alternative to fusion. Although the results of anecdotal reports and prospective studies support this procedure, these studies have not conferred the validity of a controlled randomized study. In the present study, the author presents data obtained in such a study.
METHODS: After symptoms failed to respond to conservative therapy, 46 patients with one-level discogenic cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy were randomized to undergo arthroplasty or fusion as part of a US Food and Drug Administration medical device study. In all patients there was a minimum follow-up duration of 1 year. Equivalent results for the relief of arm pain and neck pain were noted in both treatment groups. Treatment parameters other than operative time were similar. No neurological or serious systemic complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Although extended follow-up data and larger patient populations are needed, the results of this study indicate that arthroplasty is a viable alternative to cervical fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16381203     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.3.6.0424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  16 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Geographic variation in the surgical treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease: American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Quality Improvement Initiative; part II candidates.

Authors:  Kevin J McGuire; John Harrast; Harry Herkowitz; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  WITHDRAWN: Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Toon F M Boselie; Paul C Willems; Henk van Mameren; Rob de Bie; Edward C Benzel; Henk van Santbrink
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 5.  The role of stem cell therapies in degenerative lumbar spine disease: a review.

Authors:  David Oehme; Tony Goldschlager; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Peter Ghosh; Graham Jenkin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Cervical radiculopathy: is a prosthesis preferred over fusion surgery? A systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline M W Goedmakers; Tessa Janssen; Xiaoyu Yang; Mark P Arts; Ronald H M A Bartels; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Comparison of the short- and long-term treatment effect of cervical disk replacement and anterior cervical disk fusion: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aikeremujiang Muheremu; Xiaohui Niu; Zhongyan Wu; Yilixiati Muhanmode; Wei Tian
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-05

8.  [Cervical arthroplasty using the Bryan Cervical Disc System].

Authors:  Friedrich Weber; Michael Detzner
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  The NEtherlands Cervical Kinematics (NECK) trial. Cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with or without interbody fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation; a double-blind randomised multicenter study.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; Elske van den Akker; Bart W Koes; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Polyurethane on titanium unconstrained disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc disease: a review of level I-II randomized clinical trials including clinical outcomes.

Authors:  María Aragonés; Eduardo Hevia; Carlos Barrios
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.