[Biocompatibility testing of different sterilised or disinfected allogenous bone grafts in comparison to the gold standard of autologous bone grafts--an "in vitro" analysis of immunomodulation].

INTRODUCTION: Repair of large skeletal defects using bone allografts has become a routine procedure in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. Different procedures of sterilisation (82.5 degrees C disinfection; 121 degrees C autoclaving; PES; Tutoplast; 25 kGy gamma irradiation) are available to inactivate bacteria and fungi, including their spores, as well as viruses in human bone allografts. The efficiency of these procedures has been proven. However, the effects on the cellular response are rarely investigated. This present in vitro study investigates the immunological answer of human bone marrow cells to human allogenous and autologous bone platelets which were sterilised by different methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human bone marrow cells and the bone platelets were harvested from patients undergoing a total hip replacement. All patients provided informed consent. Human bone platelets, 10 mm in diameter, 3 mm in height, were produced from femoral heads which were removed within the scope of total hip replacements. They were sterilised by different procedures or were disinfected (gamma radiotherapy, PES/ethanol treatment, Tutoplast procedure, 121 degrees C autoclaving, > 82.5 degrees C thermodisinfection). In addition, an autologous in vitro bone donation was simulated and compared with the allogenous bone grafts. Endobon was evaluated as a bovine hydroxyapatite ceramic. As control a human bone marrow cell culture without bone platelets was used. Over a period of four weeks the changes of the immunogenic cell populations were analysed in vitro (FACS analysis). Light and scanning microscopy were done to reveal morphological differences. As a vitality test the trypan-blue staining was performed.
RESULTS: Light and scanning microscopy demonstrated large differences between the various sterilisation and disinfection methods. After 4 weeks the autologous bone platelets were completely covered with homogenously distributed human osteoblast like cells. The heat-sterilised/disinfected transplants demonstrated similar effects compared to the autologous bone grafts while the irradiated bone platelets demonstrated less cell coverage. 2/3 of the cells were vital on average after four weeks, with the exception of the irradiated bone platelets. The FACS analysis revealed in comparison to the control group provable differences in the immunological answer for the autologous bone donation as well as for the differently sterilised or disinfected allogenous bone grafts. The heat sterilisation or, respectively, disinfection methods compared to the autologous bone donation demonstrated almost similar in vitro effects. By far the worst results, characterised by an excessively increased portion of cytotoxic T-cells and a decreased amount of viable cells, were seen in the 25 kGy gamma irradiation samples.
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the influence of the different sterilisation and disinfection procedures on the differentiation of human marrow cells (host). Similar in vitro effects were seen for the autologous and heat-treated bone platelets. The treatment of allogenous bone grafts with PES/ethanol and the Tutoplast procedures showed, just as Endobon, only low differences in comparison with the control cultures. The worse results in the case of the irradiated bone platelets may be explained by the production of free radicals which led to an excessive cell death.