Katharine E Young1, Craig A White. 1. Section of Psychological Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of severe fatigue in disease-free breast cancer patients according to draft International Classification of Disease, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) criteria for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and to obtain further information on the validity of these criteria. Furthermore, hypotheses derived from psychosocial theories of fatigue regarding the association of fatigue with activity level, psychological distress, and cognitive constructs were also tested. METHODS: Sixty-nine disease-free breast cancer patients were assessed at least 6 months posttreatment, using self-report questionnaires and a structured interview. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of the sample met criteria for CRF. This subgroup differed significantly from the rest of the sample on multiple measures of fatigue and interference. Self-reported activity level bore no relationship to fatigue. Fear of recurrence (FOR) contributed to fatigue indirectly, whilst psychological distress and beliefs about activity appeared to predict fatigue directly. CONCLUSION: The validity of the draft ICD-10 criteria for CRF was supported. Further research is required into the relationship between fatigue, emotional distress, and cognitive-behavioural factors.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of severe fatigue in disease-free breast cancerpatients according to draft International Classification of Disease, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) criteria for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and to obtain further information on the validity of these criteria. Furthermore, hypotheses derived from psychosocial theories of fatigue regarding the association of fatigue with activity level, psychological distress, and cognitive constructs were also tested. METHODS: Sixty-nine disease-free breast cancerpatients were assessed at least 6 months posttreatment, using self-report questionnaires and a structured interview. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of the sample met criteria for CRF. This subgroup differed significantly from the rest of the sample on multiple measures of fatigue and interference. Self-reported activity level bore no relationship to fatigue. Fear of recurrence (FOR) contributed to fatigue indirectly, whilst psychological distress and beliefs about activity appeared to predict fatigue directly. CONCLUSION: The validity of the draft ICD-10 criteria for CRF was supported. Further research is required into the relationship between fatigue, emotional distress, and cognitive-behavioural factors.
Authors: Namie Okino Sawada; Juliana Maria de Paula; Helena Megumi Sonobe; Marcia Maria Fontão Zago; Giselle Patricia Guerrero; Adriana Cristina Nicolussi Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Karin Struik; Martin Klein; Jan J Heimans; Marieke F Gielissen; Gijs Bleijenberg; Martin J Taphoorn; Jaap C Reijneveld; Tjeerd J Postma Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Cecile A Lengacher; Richard R Reich; Carly L Paterson; Sophia Ramesar; Jong Y Park; Carissa Alinat; Versie Johnson-Mallard; Manolete Moscoso; Pinky Budhrani-Shani; Branko Miladinovic; Paul B Jacobsen; Charles E Cox; Matthew Goodman; Kevin E Kip Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kristine A Donovan; Kevin D Stein; Morgan Lee; Corinne R Leach; Onaedo Ilozumba; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Andrea M Barsevick; Michael R Irwin; Pamela Hinds; Andrew Miller; Ann Berger; Paul Jacobsen; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Bryce B Reeve; Karen Mustian; Ann O'Mara; Jin-Shei Lai; Michael Fisch; David Cella Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Helen J Michielsen; Alida F W Van der Steeg; Jan A Roukema; Jolanda De Vries Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-02-07 Impact factor: 3.603