Literature DB >> 16378790

Bridging the quality gap in diabetic hyperlipidemia: a practice-based intervention.

Philip S Mehler1, Mori J Krantz, Rita A Lundgren, Raymond O Estacio, Thomas D MacKenzie, Laurel Petralia, William R Hiatt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dyslipidemia treatment dramatically decreases coronary heart disease risk in diabetes, yet only a minority of these patients are screened or achieve optimal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Our aim was to increase the percentage of diabetic patients in whom lipid management was achieved through electronic and direct educational detailing.
METHODS: The study cohort comprised 884 diabetic patients at 12 primary care practices. Practice sites were randomized to one of three intervention groups: electronic educational detailing, direct (face-to-face) educational detailing, or control. Direct and electronic detailing were performed over a 12-month period. All sites were notified of our goal to enhance lipid testing among diabetic patients. Chart abstraction was performed 15 months after the start of the intervention. For the entire population (n=884), the proportion of patients with lipid testing was calculated, and changes from pre- to postintervention were compared across groups. We compared pre- and postintervention LDL-cholesterol changes between groups using least square means to account for site variation.
RESULTS: Favorable provider actions increased significantly with the intervention (+22% compared with +6% in controls, P=.01). By logistic regression, electronic detailing increased the likelihood of lipid testing (odds ratio 3.0, confidence interval 1.6-5.7), as did direct detailing (odds ratio 1.8, confidence interval 0.9-3.7) in patients with no preintervention LDL test (n=432). Lipid testing tended to increase to a greater extent at intervention sites (+23% for the combination of electronic and direct detailing vs +11% for controls, P=.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Brief educational detailing either through direct or electronic communication favorably impacts provider behavior regarding dyslipidemia care for diabetic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16378790     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.07.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a community health worker cardiovascular risk reduction program in public health and health care settings.

Authors:  Mori J Krantz; Stephanie M Coronel; Elizabeth M Whitley; Rita Dale; Jason Yost; Raymond O Estacio
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  The impact of interventions on appointment and clinical outcomes for individuals with diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lynn Nuti; Ayten Turkcan; Mark A Lawley; Lingsong Zhang; Laura Sands; Sara McComb
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Meta-regression analyses to explain statistical heterogeneity in a systematic review of strategies for guideline implementation in primary health care.

Authors:  Susanne Unverzagt; Frank Peinemann; Matthias Oemler; Kristin Braun; Andreas Klement
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Katrien J Groenhof; Folkert W Asselbergs; Rolf H H Groenwold; Diederick E Grobbee; Frank L J Visseren; Michiel L Bots
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.