Literature DB >> 16378668

Spinal manipulation force and duration affect vertebral movement and neuromuscular responses.

Christopher J Colloca1, Tony S Keller, Deed E Harrison, Robert J Moore, Robert Gunzburg, Donald D Harrison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous study in human subjects has documented biomechanical and neurophysiological responses to impulsive spinal manipulative thrusts, but very little is known about the neuromechanical effects of varying thrust force-time profiles.
METHODS: Ten adolescent Merino sheep were anesthetized and posteroanterior mechanical thrusts were applied to the L3 spinous process using a computer-controlled, mechanical testing apparatus. Three variable pulse durations (10, 100, 200 ms, force = 80 N) and three variable force amplitudes (20, 40, 60 N, pulse duration = 100 ms) were examined for their effect on lumbar motion response (L3 displacement, L1, L2 acceleration) and normalized multifidus electromyographic response (L3, L4) using a repeated measures analysis of variance.
FINDINGS: Increasing L3 posteroanterior force amplitude resulted in a fourfold linear increase in L3 posteroanterior vertebral displacement (p < 0.001) and adjacent segment (L1, L2) posteroanterior acceleration response (p < 0.001). L3 displacement was linearly correlated (p < 0.001) to the acceleration response over the 20-80 N force range (100 ms). At constant force, 10 ms thrusts resulted in nearly fivefold lower L3 displacements and significantly increased segmental (L2) acceleration responses compared to the 100 ms (19%, p = 0.005) and 200 ms (16%, p = 0.023) thrusts. Normalized electromyographic responses increased linearly with increasing force amplitude at higher amplitudes and were appreciably affected by mechanical excitation pulse duration.
INTERPRETATION: Changes in the biomechanical and neuromuscular response of the ovine lumbar spine were observed in response to changes in the force-time characteristics of the spinal manipulative thrusts and may be an underlying mechanism in related clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16378668     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  25 in total

1.  Characteristics of Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Michael A K Liebschner; Joshua W Little; Maruti R Gudavalli
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Muscular contributions to dynamic dorsoventral lumbar spine stiffness.

Authors:  Tony S Keller; Christopher J Colloca; Deed E Harrison; Robert J Moore; Robert Gunzburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Validation of a sham comparator for thoracic spinal manipulation in patients with shoulder pain.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Joseph R Kardouni; Catarina O Sousa; Jacqueline M Ely
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-09-06

4.  The effect of duration and amplitude of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Michèle Vaillant; Tiffany Edgecombe; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-07-17

5.  The effect of spinal manipulation impulse duration on spine neuromechanical responses.

Authors:  Isabelle Pagé; François Nougarou; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

6.  Effect of spinal manipulation thrust magnitude on trunk mechanical activation thresholds of lateral thalamic neurons.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Cynthia R Long
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 7.  Spinal manipulative therapy and somatosensory activation.

Authors:  J G Pickar; P S Bolton
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Spatiotemporal Expression of 3-B-3(-) and 7-D-4 Chondroitin Sulfation, Tissue Remodeling, and Attempted Repair in an Ovine Model of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Authors:  Brooke Farrugia; Susan M Smith; Cindy C Shu; James Melrose
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  A preliminary study comparing the use of cervical/upper thoracic mobilization and manipulation for individuals with mechanical neck pain.

Authors:  David Griswold; Ken Learman; Bryan O'Halloran; Josh Cleland
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-05

10.  Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.