Literature DB >> 16378564

Estimation of blood glucose levels by people with diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

Stuart Frankum1, Jane Ogden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recommendations suggest that all patients with diabetes who use insulin should home test their blood glucose. Recommendations for those not using insulin remain contradictory. These recommendations are in part based upon the assumption that people with diabetes cannot make an accurate estimate. AIM: To explore whether people with diabetes can accurately estimate their blood glucose levels and to assess which factors explain variability in these estimates.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional design.
SETTING: One general practice in Oxfordshire, UK. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifteen consecutive patients with diabetes attending a diabetic clinic were invited to estimate their blood glucose level prior to having it routinely measured.
RESULTS: One hundred and four patients made estimates. Of these, 45 (43.3%) underestimated their blood glucose, 18 (17.3%) overestimated, and 41 (39.4%) made guesses that fell into the range defined as accurate. Of those not using insulin (n = 85), 37 (43.5%) underestimated their blood glucose, 12 (14%) overestimated and 36 (42.3%) were accurate. Accuracy in the non-insulin users was associated with home testing, lower blood glucose levels, coming to the clinic in a fasting state, and reporting no symptoms when they felt that their blood glucose level was high. Overestimation was associated with having co-occurring illnesses and experiencing no symptoms when their blood glucose was low.
CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with diabetes in this study could not accurately estimate their blood glucose levels indicating that home testing may be a necessary part of diabetes self care. Home testing may also function as a form of biofeedback to facilitate an improved ability to estimate blood glucose levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16378564      PMCID: PMC1570512     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  17 in total

1.  Adherence to self-care and glycaemic control among people with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M Toljamo; M Hentinen
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Self-monitoring in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Coster; M C Gulliford; P T Seed; J K Powrie; R Swaminathan
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  Blood pressure-lowering effects of biofeedback treatment in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mutsuhiro Nakao; Eiji Yano; Shinobu Nomura; Tomifusa Kuboki
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  Dietary pattern of self-care among Asian and Caucasian diabetic patients.

Authors:  Danny Meetoo
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2004 Oct 14-27

5.  A desktop guide for the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM): an update. European NIDDM Policy Group.

Authors:  K G Alberti; F A Gries; J Jervell; H M Krans
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.359

6.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Blood glucose self-monitoring in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study of patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Peel; Odette Parry; Margaret Douglas; Julia Lawton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Blood pressure biofeedback treatment of white-coat hypertension.

Authors:  M Nakao; S Nomura; T Shimosawa; T Fujita; T Kuboki
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Blood glucose estimations in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: predictors of accuracy and error.

Authors:  Lisa J Meltzer; Suzanne Bennett Johnson; Sarah Pappachan; Janet Silverstein
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2003 Apr-May
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Interoceptive dysfunction: toward an integrated framework for understanding somatic and affective disturbance in depression.

Authors:  Christopher Harshaw
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Self-management knowledge and practice of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Baghdad, Iraq: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ehab Mudher Mikhael; Mohamed Azmi Hassali; Saad Abdulrahman Hussain; Nizar Shawky
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.168

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.