Literature DB >> 16378531

Q methodology in health economics.

Rachel Baker1, Carl Thompson, Russell Mannion.   

Abstract

The recognition that health economists need to understand the meaning of data if they are to adequately understand research findings which challenge conventional economic theory has led to the growth of qualitative modes of enquiry in health economics. The use of qualitative methods of exploration and description alongside quantitative techniques gives rise to a number of epistemological, ontological and methodological challenges: difficulties in accounting for subjectivity in choices, the need for rigour and transparency in method, and problems of disciplinary acceptability to health economists. Q methodology is introduced as a means of overcoming some of these challenges. We argue that Q offers a means of exploring subjectivity, beliefs and values while retaining the transparency, rigour and mathematical underpinnings of quantitative techniques. The various stages of Q methodological enquiry are outlined alongside potential areas of application in health economics, before discussing the strengths and limitations of the approach. We conclude that Q methodology is a useful addition to economists' methodological armoury and one that merits further consideration and evaluation in the study of health services.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16378531     DOI: 10.1258/135581906775094217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  10 in total

1.  Neither Knowledge Deficit nor NIMBY: Understanding Opposition to Hydraulic Fracturing as a Nuanced Coalition in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania (USA).

Authors:  Danielle M McLaughlin; Bethany B Cutts
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Valuing patients' experiences of healthcare processes: towards broader applications of existing methods.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan; Philip Kinghorn; Vikki A Entwistle; Jill J Francis
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Public values and plurality in health priority setting: What to do when people disagree and why we should care about reasons as well as choices.

Authors:  Rachel Baker; Helen Mason; Neil McHugh; Cam Donaldson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Supported self-management in community stroke rehabilitation: what is it and how does it work? A protocol for a realist evaluation study.

Authors:  Lisa Kidd; Julie Duncan Millar; Helen Mason; Terry Quinn; Katie I Gallacher; Fiona Jones; Rebecca J Fisher; Therese Lebedis; Mark Barber; Katrina Brennan; Mark Smith
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right and an expensive death? Exploring societal perspectives.

Authors:  Neil McHugh; Rachel M Baker; Helen Mason; Laura Williamson; Job van Exel; Rohan Deogaonkar; Marissa Collins; Cam Donaldson
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Patterns of patient and healthcare provider viewpoints regarding participation in HIV cure-related clinical trials. Findings from a multicentre French survey using Q methodology (ANRS-APSEC).

Authors:  Christel Protière; Bruno Spire; Marion Mora; Isabelle Poizot-Martin; Marie Préau; Marjolaine Doumergue; Philippe Morlat; David Zucman; Cécile Goujard; François Raffi; Olivier Lambotte; Marie Suzan-Monti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Q sample construction: a novel approach incorporating a Delphi technique to explore opinions about codeine dependence.

Authors:  Melissa Kirschbaum; Tony Barnett; Merylin Cross
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Views on deceased organ donation in the Netherlands: A q-methodology study.

Authors:  Daphne Truijens; Job van Exel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Patients as team members: Factors affecting involvement in treatment decisions from the perspective of patients with a chronic condition.

Authors:  Martina Buljac-Samardzic; Mark A Clark; N Job A van Exel; Jeroen D H van Wijngaarden
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Are life-extending treatments for terminal illnesses a special case? Exploring choices and societal viewpoints.

Authors:  Neil McHugh; Job van Exel; Helen Mason; Jon Godwin; Marissa Collins; Cam Donaldson; Rachel Baker
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.634

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.