Literature DB >> 16377814

Leadership values in academic medicine.

Wiley W Souba1, David V Day.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To gain a deeper understanding of the guiding core values that deans of academic medical centers (AMCs) considered most essential for their leadership and the major leadership challenges that confront them.
METHOD: In 2003-04, semistructured interviews of 18 deans at U.S. colleges of medicine or AMCs were organized around four dimensions: background, leadership challenges, organizational effectiveness, and systems enablers/restrainers for leadership. A values Q-sort was used to determine how widely core values were shared among deans and how the complex challenges they faced did or did not align with these values.
RESULTS: Fourteen of the 18 (78%) deans identified financial difficulties as their most pressing leadership challenge, followed by weak institutional alignment (61%), staffing problems (33%), and poor morale (28%). Open, candid communication was reported as the most effective means of addressing these complex problems. Enacting espoused shared values and having a positive attitude were identified as the most important enablers of systemic leadership, whereas micromanagement and difficult people were the major restraints. Q-sort results on 38 positive leadership values indicated that participants considered integrity most essential. Integrity was positively correlated with humanistic values and negatively correlated with results. Vision, another highly espoused value, correlated strongly with performance-oriented values but correlated negatively with humanistic values.
CONCLUSIONS: A dynamic tension exists in AMCs between humanistic values and performance-based core values. The ability to manage that tension (i.e., when to prioritize one set of values over the other) is inherent in a dean's work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16377814     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200601000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  7 in total

1.  The being of leadership.

Authors:  Wiley W Souba
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.464

2.  A qualitative study of faculty members' views of women chairs.

Authors:  Carol Isaac; Lindsay Griffin; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Caring attitudes in medical education: perceptions of deans and curriculum leaders.

Authors:  Beth A Lown; Calvin L Chou; William D Clark; Paul Haidet; Maysel Kemp White; Edward Krupat; Stephen Pelletier; Peter Weissmann; M Brownell Anderson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  What a medical school chair wants from the dean.

Authors:  Robert Hromas; Robert Leverence; Lazarus K Mramba; J Larry Jameson; Caryn Lerman; Thomas L Schwenk; Ellen M Zimmermann; Michael L Good
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2018-05-23

5.  The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Lerchenfeldt; Misa Mi; Marty Eng
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Assessment of the Association of Leadership Behaviors of Supervising Physicians With Personal-Organizational Values Alignment Among Staff Physicians.

Authors:  Tait D Shanafelt; Hanhan Wang; Mary Leonard; Mary Hawn; Quinn McKenna; Rick Majzun; Lloyd Minor; Mickey Trockel
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

7.  How Can We Raise Awareness of Physician's Needs in Order to Increase Adherence to Management and Leadership Training?

Authors:  Christian Voirol; Marie-France Pelland; Julie Lajeunesse; Jean Pelletier; Rejean Duplain; Josee Dubois; Silvy Lachance; Carole Lambert; Julia Sader; Marie-Claude Audetat
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2021-04-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.