Literature DB >> 1637781

Depot characteristics and biodistribution of interleukin-2 liposomes: importance of route of administration.

P M Anderson1, E Katsanis, S F Sencer, D Hasz, A C Ochoa, B Bostrom.   

Abstract

Due to rapid clearance of interleukin-2 (IL-2), it has had limited effective use as an in vivo immunostimulant. Current experimental and clinical protocols generally must utilize large doses, multiple injections, or continuous infusions of IL-2 in order to achieve significant immunostimulation, often at the expense of systemic toxicity. Therefore, the pharmacodynamics of IL-2 liposomes were investigated. IL-2 liposome incorporation efficiency was 80.4% (SD 5.5); vesicle diameter was 1.65 microns (SD 0.09) as determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Both formulation (free cytokine vs. IL-2 liposomes) and route of administration were important variables in determination of the biodistribution and pharmacokinetic characteristics of IL-2. When free [125I]IL-2 was given i.v. to mice, only 6.5% was in the blood and 3% in liver and spleen 2 h after injection; on the other hand, at 2 h greater than 70% of i.v. [125I]IL-2 liposomes were detected in the blood, liver, spleen, and lungs. Mean i.v. elimination t1/2 from the blood of rats given 20 x 10(6) U/kg free cytokine or IL-2 liposomes was 41 versus 102 min, respectively, as measured by bioassay and 59 and 119 min as measured by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). After i.v. administration, the estimated Vd of IL-2 liposomes was 13-fold smaller than the free cytokine. Intrathoracic (i.tx.), i.p., and s.c. administration of [125I]IL-2 to mice also demonstrated significant depot effects when IL-2 was incorporated into liposomes. These data suggest IL-2 liposomes may provide in vivo immunostimulation superior to the free cytokine due to biodistribution and depot characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1637781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunother (1991)        ISSN: 1053-8550


  9 in total

1.  Using nanoparticles for in situ vaccination against cancer: mechanisms and immunotherapy benefits.

Authors:  Michael-Joseph Gorbet; Akansha Singh; Chenkai Mao; Steven Fiering; Ashish Ranjan
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 2.  Particle-mediated delivery of cytokines for immunotherapy.

Authors:  David A Christian; Christopher A Hunter
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 3.  Emerging nanotechnologies for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Sourabh Shukla; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 4.  Interleukin-2. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Ruth Whittington; Diana Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Effect of interleukin-2 on the biodistribution of technetium-99m-labelled anti-CEA monoclonal antibody in mice bearing human tumour xenografts.

Authors:  K Nakamura; A Kubo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-09

Review 6.  Nanoparticle-Based Manipulation of Antigen-Presenting Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ronnie H Fang; Ashley V Kroll; Liangfang Zhang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 7.  Liposomes as carriers of cancer chemotherapy. Current status and future prospects.

Authors:  S Kim
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models for the depletion of Vbeta5.2/5.3 T cells by the monoclonal antibody ATM-027 in patients with multiple sclerosis, as measured by FACS.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Zingmark; Charlotte Edenius; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Effects of route and formulation on clinical pharmacokinetics of interleukin-2.

Authors:  P M Anderson; M A Sorenson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.447

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.