Literature DB >> 16377322

Diphenhydramine as an adjunct to sedation for colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Raymond H Tu1, Pam Grewall, Joseph W Leung, Arun G Suryaprasad, Paul I Sheykhzadeh, Caitlin Doan, Juan Carlos Garcia, Nan Zhang, Thomas Prindiville, Surinder Mann, Walter Trudeau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous benzodiazepines in combination with opiates are used to achieve moderate sedation for colonoscopy. Although effective, these agents have potential adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and hypotension. Diphenhydramine hydrochloride possesses central nervous system depressant effects that theoretically could provide a synergistic effect for sedating patients.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the efficacy of adding diphenhydramine hydrochloride as an adjunct to improve sedation and to reduce the amount of standard sedatives used during colonoscopy.
DESIGN: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
SETTING: The study was conducted in a university hospital with an active GI fellowship training program. PATIENTS: The study group comprised 270 patients undergoing screening/diagnostic/therapeutic colonoscopy were enrolled.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either 50 mg of diphenhydramine or placebo, given intravenously 3 minutes before starting conscious sedation with intravenous midazolam and meperidine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome measure was anesthetic effect as assessed by the endoscopy team and by the patient; quantity of adjunctive sedatives to achieve adequate sedation.
RESULTS: Of 270 patients, data were analyzed for 258 patients, with 130 patients in the diphenhydramine group and 128 patients in the placebo group. There was a 10.1% reduction in meperidine usage and 13.7% reduction in midazolam usage in favor of the diphenhydramine group. The mean evaluation scores as judged by the faculty, the fellows, and the nurses were statistically significant in favor of the diphenhydramine group. In addition, patient scores for overall sedation and pain level favored the group that received diphenhydramine.
CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous diphenhydramine given before initiation of standard sedation offers a significant benefit to conscious sedation for patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16377322     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  12 in total

1.  Prospective description of coughing, hemodynamic changes, and oxygen desaturation during endoscopic sedation.

Authors:  Abdul Hamid El Chafic; George Eckert; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Drug-versus-drug adverse event rate comparisons: a pilot study based on data from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Authors:  Alan M Hochberg; Ronald K Pearson; Donald J O'Hara; Stephanie J Reisinger
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Continued midazolam versus diphenhydramine in difficult-to-sedate patients: a randomized double-blind trial.

Authors:  Hamita Sachar; Nipaporn Pichetshote; Kavitha Nandigam; Keta Vaidya; Loren Laine
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Impact of computerized physician order entry alerts on prescribing in older patients.

Authors:  Paula E Lester; Liliana Rios-Rojas; Shahidul Islam; Melissa J Fazzari; Irving H Gomolin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Posterior lingual lidocaine: a novel method to improve tolerance in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Assaad M Soweid; Shadi R Yaghi; Faek R Jamali; Abdallah A Kobeissy; Michella E Mallat; Rola Hussein; Chakib M Ayoub
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Pilot feasibility study of the method of water infusion without air insufflation in sedated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Joseph W Leung; Rodolei Salera; Lee Toomsen; Surinder Mann; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Ambulatory Anesthesia for a Case of Idiopathic Bronchiolitis Obliterans.

Authors:  Michelle Wong
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2021-06-01

8.  A pilot study about tolerability to double balloon endoscopy: comparison to esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jeong-Sik Byeon; Kee Wook Jung; Hyun-Suk Song; Kee Don Choi; Byong Duk Ye; Mi Young Do; Soon Man Yoon; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jin-Ho Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) sedation: clinical utility of fospropofol.

Authors:  Eric A Harris; David A Lubarsky; Keith A Candiotti
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block versus Lidocaine Spray to Improve Tolerance in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Moisés Ortega Ramírez; Benigno Linares Segovia; Marco Antonio García Cuevas; Jorge Luis Sánchez Romero; Illich Botello Buenrostro; Norma Amador Licona; Juan Manuel Guízar Mendoza; Jesús Francisco Guerrero Romero; Víctor Manuel Vázquez Zárate
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.