Literature DB >> 16377279

Comparison of coronary arterial finding by intravascular ultrasound in patients with "transient no-reflow" versus "reflow" during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome.

Raisuke Iijima1, Hideo Shinji, Nobutaka Ikeda, Hideki Itaya, Kunihiko Makino, Atsushi Funatsu, Itaru Yokouchi, Hirotaka Komatsu, Naoki Ito, Hiroya Nuruki, Rintaro Nakajima, Masato Nakamura.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that transient no-reflow during coronary intervention but with Thrombosis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow at the completion of the procedure is associated with increased in-hospital and 6-month mortality. We hypothesized that the use of intravascular ultrasound before intervention could identify morphologic features that were predictive of transient no-reflow in patients who had acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We analyzed 220 patients with ACS who had suitable intravascular ultrasound images that were acquired before intervention. We defined "transient no-reflow" as TIMI grade 0, 1, or 2 flow during the procedure and TIMI grade 3 flow at the completion of the procedure. We defined "reflow" as good coronary flow (TIMI grade 3 flow) during and after the procedure. Patients were categorized to a transient no-reflow group (n = 20) or a reflow group (n = 200). In the transient no-reflow group, vessel area and amount of plaque burden in the culprit lesion were significantly greater than in the reflow group (vessel 20.8 +/- 5.4 vs 16.4 +/- 6.2 mm(2), p < 0.01; plaque burden 0.90 +/- 0.03 vs 0.83 +/- 0.08, p < 0.001). The presence of ruptured plaque, lipid pool-like images, and thrombus formation were significantly higher in the transient no-reflow group than in the reflow group. Multivariate analysis identified the presence of thrombus formation (odds ratio 4.53, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 20.0, p = 0.04) and larger plaque burden (odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 3.23, p = 0.05) as independent predictors of transient no-reflow. In conclusion, lesion morphologies are different for transient no-reflow and reflow. These findings suggest that the presence of thrombus formation and large plaque burden increase the risk for developing transient no-reflow during coronary intervention for ACS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16377279     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  17 in total

1.  Intravascular ultrasound appearance of scattered necrotic core as an index for deterioration of coronary flow during intervention in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Kenji Sakata; Masa-aki Kawashiri; Hidekazu Ino; Takao Matsubara; Yoshihide Uno; Toshihiko Yasuda; Kenji Miwa; Honin Kanaya; Masakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Predictors and long-term prognosis of angiographic slow/no-reflow phenomenon during emergency percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevated acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Li Dong-bao; Hua Qi; Liu Zhi; Wang Shan; Jin Wei-ying
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  A simple and rapid method for identification of lesions at high risk for the no-reflow phenomenon immediately before elective coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  Akira Suda; Shigeto Namiuchi; Tomohiro Kawaguchi; Taro Nihei; Toru Takii; Kenya Saji; Tadashi Sugie; Atsushi Kato; Hiroaki Shimokawa
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Repeated occurrence of slow flow phenomenon during and late after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Kenji Sakata; Masanobu Namura; Toshimitsu Takagi; Naoto Tama; Isao Inoki; Hidenobu Terai; Yuki Horita; Masatoshi Ikeda; Masakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Coronary thrombus in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI: Prognostic significance and management.

Authors:  Sabine Vecchio; Elisabetta Varani; Tania Chechi; Marco Balducelli; Giuseppe Vecchi; Matteo Aquilina; Giulia Ricci Lucchi; Alessandro Dal Monte; Massimo Margheri
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-26

6.  Association between tissue characteristics of coronary plaque and distal embolization after coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome patients: insights from a meta-analysis of virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound studies.

Authors:  Song Ding; Longwei Xu; Fan Yang; Lingcong Kong; Yichao Zhao; Lingchen Gao; Wei Wang; Rende Xu; Heng Ge; Meng Jiang; Jun Pu; Ben He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of plaque components on no-reflow phenomenon after stent deployment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound analysis.

Authors:  Young Joon Hong; Myung Ho Jeong; Yun Ha Choi; Jum Suk Ko; Min Goo Lee; Won Yu Kang; Shin Eun Lee; Soo Hyun Kim; Keun Ho Park; Doo Sun Sim; Nam Sik Yoon; Hyun Ju Youn; Kye Hun Kim; Hyung Wook Park; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park; Jung Chaee Kang
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 8.  Role of Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Young Joon Hong; Youngkeun Ahn; Myung Ho Jeong
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.243

9.  Relation of Angiographic Thrombus Burden with Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Hakan Duman; Mustafa Çetin; Murtaza Emre Durakoğlugil; Hüsnü Değirmenci; Hikmet Hamur; Mehmet Bostan; Zakir Karadağ; Yüksel Çiçek
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-11-17

10.  Slow-flow phenomenon after elective percutaneous coronary intervention of computed tomography-detected vulnerable coronary lesion.

Authors:  Rafał Wolny; Artur Dębski; Mariusz Kruk; Cezary Kępka
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 1.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.