Literature DB >> 16376664

Accuracy of the Lang II stereotest in screening for binocular disorders in 6-year-old children.

Son C Huynh1, Elvis Ojaimi, Dana Robaei, Kathryn Rose, Paul Mitchell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of the Lang II stereotest in screening for strabismus, amblyopia, and anisometropia in 6-year-old children.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based study.
METHODS: The Sydney Myopia Study examined 1765 6-year-old children (78.9% of eligible) who were identified by random cluster sampling of 34 schools in Sydney, Australia. Sensitivity and specificity of the Lang II stereotest was determined by best stereoacuity. Cycloplegic autorefraction, assessment of visual acuity, and ocular motility were conducted.
RESULTS: Test sensitivity ranged from 21.4% for anisometropia (> or =1.0 diopter) to 31.3% for amblyopia. The detection rate for new cases of amblyopia ranged from 20% to 40%; the detection rate for new cases of strabismus was 30%. Specificity was >98% in all three conditions. Children with false-negative results included newly diagnosed cases of strabismus (14 of 25 children) or amblyopia (5 of 12 children).
CONCLUSION: The Lang II stereotest, when used alone, has very limited value as a screening test of binocular dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16376664     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  9 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia and its risk factors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christine Schmucker; Robert Grosselfinger; Rob Riemsma; Gerd Antes; Stefan Lange; Wolf Lagrèze; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The potential cost-effectiveness of amblyopia screening programs.

Authors:  David B Rein; John S Wittenborn; Xinzhi Zhang; Michael Song; Jinan B Saaddine
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.402

4.  Validation of dynamic random dot stereotests in pediatric vision screening.

Authors:  Anna Budai; András Czigler; Eszter Mikó-Baráth; Vanda A Nemes; Gábor Horváth; Ágota Pusztai; David P Piñero; Gábor Jandó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Tests for detecting strabismus in children aged 1 to 6 years in the community.

Authors:  Sarah Hull; Vijay Tailor; Sara Balduzzi; Jugnoo Rahi; Christine Schmucker; Gianni Virgili; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-06

6.  Stereo tests as a screening tool for strabismus: which is the best choice?

Authors:  Chiara Ancona; Monica Stoppani; Veronica Odazio; Carlo La Spina; Giulia Corradetti; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-12

7.  The impact of active research involvement of young children in the design of a new stereotest.

Authors:  Therese Casanova; Carla Black; Sheima Rafiq; Jessica Hugill-Jones; Jenny C A Read; Kathleen Vancleef
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-06-06

Review 8.  Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth?

Authors:  Anna R O'Connor; Laurence P Tidbury
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  The difference of distance stereoacuity measured with different separating methods.

Authors:  Lingzhi Zhao; Yu Zhang; Huang Wu; Jun Xiao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.