Literature DB >> 16375408

Probing the contribution of electronic coupling to the directionality of electron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers.

Christine Kirmaier1, James A Bautista, Philip D Laible, Deborah K Hanson, Dewey Holten.   

Abstract

Subpicosecond transient absorption studies are reported for a set of Rhodobacter (R.) capsulatus bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) designed to probe the origins of the unidirectionality of charge separation via one of two electron transport chains in the native pigment-protein complex. All of the RCs have been engineered to contain a heterodimeric primary electron donor (D) consisting of a bacteriochlorophyll (BChl) and a bacteriopheophytin (BPh). The BPh component of the M heterodimer (Mhd) or L heterodimer (Lhd) is introduced by substituting a Leu for His M200 or His L173, respectively. Previous work on primary charge separation in heterodimer mutants has not included the Lhd RC from R. capsulatus, which we report for the first time. The Lhd and Mhd RCs are used as controls against which we assess RCs that combine the heterodimer mutations with a second mutation (His substituted for Leu at M212) that results in replacement of the native L-side BPh acceptor with a BChl (beta). The transient absorption spectra reveal clear evidence for charge separation to the normally inactive M-side BPh acceptor (H(M)) in Lhd-beta RCs to form D+H(M)- with a yield of approximately 6%. This state also forms in Mhd-beta RCs but with about one-quarter the yield. In both RCs, deactivation to the ground state is the predominant pathway of D decay, as it is in the Mhd and Lhd single mutants. Analysis of the results indicates an upper limit ofV2L/V2m < or = 4 for the contribution of the electronic coupling elements to the relative rates of electron transfer to the L versus M sides of the wild-type RC. In comparison to the L/M rate ratio (kL/kM) approximately 30 for wild-type RCs, our findings indicate that electronic factors contribute approximately 35% at most to directionality with the other 65% deriving from energetic considerations, which includes differences in free energies, reorganization energies, and contributions of one- and two-step mechanisms on the two sides of the RC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16375408     DOI: 10.1021/jp054726z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  5 in total

1.  High throughput engineering to revitalize a vestigial electron transfer pathway in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers.

Authors:  Kaitlyn M Faries; Lucas L Kressel; Marc J Wander; Dewey Holten; Philip D Laible; Christine Kirmaier; Deborah K Hanson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Cofactor-specific photochemical function resolved by ultrafast spectroscopy in photosynthetic reaction center crystals.

Authors:  Libai Huang; Nina Ponomarenko; Gary P Wiederrecht; David M Tiede
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Singlet oxygen generation in the reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  Adjaci F Uchoa; Peter P Knox; Rozane Turchielle; Nurania Kh Seifullina; Mauricio S Baptista
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  Structural and spectropotentiometric analysis of Blastochloris viridis heterodimer mutant reaction center.

Authors:  Nina S Ponomarenko; Liang Li; Antony R Marino; Valentina Tereshko; Agnes Ostafin; Julia A Popova; Edward J Bylina; Rustem F Ismagilov; James R Norris
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-06-17

5.  Effects of impurities on membrane-protein crystallization in different systems.

Authors:  Christopher A Kors; Ellen Wallace; Douglas R Davies; Liang Li; Philip D Laible; Peter Nollert
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-09-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.