Literature DB >> 16374903

The power of the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Dan Jackson1.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity in meta-analysis has low power. Although this has been investigated using simulation, there is little direct analytical evidence of the validity of this claim. Using an established approximate distribution for the test statistic, a procedure for obtaining the power of the test is described. From this, a simple formula for the power is obtained. Although this applies to a special case, the formula gives an indication of the power of the test more generally. In particular, for a given significance level, the power can be calibrated in terms of the proportion of the studies' variances that is provided by between-study variation. A consideration of this quantity confirms that the test does, in general, have low power. It is suggested that practitioners, who wish to conduct the standard test, use the ideas provided in order to investigate the operating characteristics of the test prior to performing it. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16374903     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  14 in total

1.  Alternative measures of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Reducing the impact of outlying studies.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Haitao Chu; James S Hodges
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond.

Authors:  Evangelos Evangelou; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Performance of Between-study Heterogeneity Measures in the Cochrane Library.

Authors:  Xiaoyue Ma; Lifeng Lin; Zhiyong Qu; Motao Zhu; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 4.  Effects of treatment in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karl Horvath; Klaus Koch; Klaus Jeitler; Eva Matyas; Ralf Bender; Hilda Bastian; Stefan Lange; Andrea Siebenhofer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-04-01

5.  The association between methylated CDKN2A and cervical carcinogenesis, and its diagnostic value in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jinyun Li; Chongchang Zhou; Haojie Zhou; Tianlian Bao; Tengjiao Gao; Xiangling Jiang; Meng Ye
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Ian R White; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A re-evaluation of the 'quantile approximation method' for random effects meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Jack Bowden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Twice- or once-daily dosing of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention: a fixed-effects meta-analysis with predefined heterogeneity quality criteria.

Authors:  Andreas Clemens; Herbert Noack; Martina Brueckmann; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Jack Bowden
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Early diagnostic potential of APC hypermethylation in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Bujiang Wang; Haojun Song; Haizhong Jiang; Yangbo Fu; Xiaoyun Ding; Chongchang Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.