PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a scoutless method, termed EZ-STEP, for stepping-table peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This scoutless method involves the use of a stepping-table, fast 3D MRA acquisition that incorporates spatially nonselective radiofrequency (RF) pulses for excitation to reduce the repetition time (TR). The sequence was tested in a phantom. The EZ-STEP protocol was optimized in four healthy volunteers and used in 15 subjects. The image quality was scored in a blinded fashion and compared with conventional MRA in eight patients. RESULTS: The acquisition speed of the EZ-STEP sequence was approximately 30% faster in the phantom study compared to the conventional MRA sequence. The total examination time for EZ-STEP was 6 minutes, compared to an average of 23 minutes for conventional MRA. The average image quality scores for EZ-STEP and conventional MRA for stations 1-3 were 3.50 vs. 3.06 (P = 0.087), 3.53 vs. 3.00 (P = 0.033), and 2.97 vs. 2.50 (P = 0.090), respectively. CONCLUSION: EZ-STEP is a more efficient method than the conventional approach for stepping-table peripheral CE-MRA, and provides comparable or better image quality. This method shortens the examination time substantially and eliminates the risk of failing to image a vessel because of improper positioning of the scan volume. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a scoutless method, termed EZ-STEP, for stepping-table peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This scoutless method involves the use of a stepping-table, fast 3D MRA acquisition that incorporates spatially nonselective radiofrequency (RF) pulses for excitation to reduce the repetition time (TR). The sequence was tested in a phantom. The EZ-STEP protocol was optimized in four healthy volunteers and used in 15 subjects. The image quality was scored in a blinded fashion and compared with conventional MRA in eight patients. RESULTS: The acquisition speed of the EZ-STEP sequence was approximately 30% faster in the phantom study compared to the conventional MRA sequence. The total examination time for EZ-STEP was 6 minutes, compared to an average of 23 minutes for conventional MRA. The average image quality scores for EZ-STEP and conventional MRA for stations 1-3 were 3.50 vs. 3.06 (P = 0.087), 3.53 vs. 3.00 (P = 0.033), and 2.97 vs. 2.50 (P = 0.090), respectively. CONCLUSION:EZ-STEP is a more efficient method than the conventional approach for stepping-table peripheral CE-MRA, and provides comparable or better image quality. This method shortens the examination time substantially and eliminates the risk of failing to image a vessel because of improper positioning of the scan volume. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.